Anne E. Smith

2.0k citations
42 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 18

Anne E. Smith

40 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Anne E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Applied Psychology 244
  • General Decision Sciences 86
  • Clinical Psychology 343
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 120
  • Physiology 208
Replace Kenneth P. Tercyak with:
Kenneth P. Tercyak United States
Cathy A. Simpson United States
Liesbeth van Osch Netherlands
Nina Schneider United States
Paola Gremigni Italy
Diann E. Gaalema United States
Christopher T. Franck United States
Richard I. Lanyon United States
Andrea Waylen United Kingdom
Rui Li China
Anne E. Smith relative to Kenneth P. Tercyak United States Kenneth P. Tercyak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Kenneth P. Tercyak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne E. Smith. The network helps show where Anne E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Anne E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20223
2 201710
3 20161
4 20158
5 201352
6 20105
7 2010126
8 200922
9 200910
10 200975
11
Spread too thin: faculty perpectives about faculty-student ratios in Kansas.
20083
12 200820
13 200817
14 200747
15 2006326
16 199972
17 199911
18 199352
19 199228
20 199052

About Anne E. Smith

Anne E. Smith is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Applied Psychology, Speech and Hearing, General Decision Sciences and Safety Research, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Air Quality and Health Impacts (10 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (7 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (6 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (4 papers), Noise Effects and Management (4 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (244 citations), General Decision Sciences (86 citations), Clinical Psychology (343 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (120 citations) and Physiology (208 citations). Anne E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Suchitra Krishnan‐Sarin, Dana A. Cavallo, Marc N. Potenza, Thomas Liss, Amanda McFetridge, Amy Duhig, Kathleen M. Carroll, Jean M. Sanger, Erika Swift and Charles C. Benight. Their work appears in journals such as Risk Analysis, Journal of Addiction Medicine, Environmental Health Perspectives, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association and Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026