Liesbeth van Osch
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
Papers in
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 26
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 10
- Co-authors
- Hein de VriesLilian LechnerEva JanssenAstrid ReubsaetMath J. J. M. CandelFrancine SchneiderKim RomijndersReinskje Talhout
- Journals
- British Journal of Health Psychology (5 papers)Psychology and Health (5 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (4 papers)Journal of Medical Internet Research (4 papers)BMC Public Health (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsTaiwanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Liesbeth van Osch
67 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Applied Psychology 573
- Reproductive Medicine 136
- General Decision Sciences 29
- Dermatology 128
- Physiology 350
Countries citing papers authored by Liesbeth van Osch
This map shows the geographic impact of Liesbeth van Osch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liesbeth van Osch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liesbeth van Osch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liesbeth van Osch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liesbeth van Osch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liesbeth van Osch. The network helps show where Liesbeth van Osch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liesbeth van Osch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 10 | Using a qualitative approach to assess motives for non-uptake and disengagement in digital interventions | 2016 | 2 |
| 11 | The I-Change Model and how it contributes to explaining health behaviour | 2016 | 2 |
| 12 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 67 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 89 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 28 |
About Liesbeth van Osch
Liesbeth van Osch is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Reproductive Medicine, General Decision Sciences, Dermatology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (26 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (14 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (12 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (11 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (7 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (7 papers) and Media Influence and Health (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (573 citations), Reproductive Medicine (136 citations), General Decision Sciences (29 citations), Dermatology (128 citations) and Physiology (350 citations). Liesbeth van Osch has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hein de Vries, Lilian Lechner, Eva Janssen, Astrid Reubsaet, Math J. J. M. Candel, Francine Schneider, Kim Romijnders, Reinskje Talhout, A. David Smith and Eef Hogervorst. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Health Psychology, Psychology and Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.