Thomas Liss

17 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Thomas Liss
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • General Decision Sciences 76
  • Applied Psychology 161
  • Physiology 234
  • Clinical Psychology 167
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 92
Replace Amanda McFetridge with:
Amanda McFetridge United States
Robert Dantona United States
Jocelyn Cuevas United States
Liqa N. Athamneh United States
Rachel L. Gunn United States
Vincent J. Adesso United States
Jennifer M. Wray United States
Stacy R. Ryan United States
Melissa Piasecki United States
Lyuba Bobova United States
Thomas Liss relative to Amanda McFetridge United States Amanda McFetridge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Amanda McFetridge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Liss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Liss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Liss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Liss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Liss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Liss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Liss. The network helps show where Thomas Liss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Liss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Liss Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Liss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2006328
2 2010131
3 200682
4 200848
5 200747
6 201245
7 201843
8 201340
9 201328
10 200826
11 200321
12 200820
13 20107
14 20105
15 20143
16 20132
17 20252

About Thomas Liss

Thomas Liss is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 878 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (76 citations), Applied Psychology (161 citations), Physiology (234 citations), Clinical Psychology (167 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (92 citations). Thomas Liss has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Suchitra Krishnan‐Sarin, Dana A. Cavallo, Amanda McFetridge, Anne E. Smith, Marc N. Potenza, Amy Duhig, Kathleen M. Carroll, Ty S. Schepis, Brady Reynolds and Rani A. Desai. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Addiction Medicine, Substance Abuse and Psychology of Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact