Anne B. Lane

931 total citations
27 papers, 560 citations indexed

About

Anne B. Lane is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne B. Lane has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 560 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Communication, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 7 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Anne B. Lane's work include Public Relations and Crisis Communication (19 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (11 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (6 papers). Anne B. Lane is often cited by papers focused on Public Relations and Crisis Communication (19 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (11 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (6 papers). Anne B. Lane collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. Anne B. Lane's co-authors include Kim A. Johnston, Bree Devin, Michael L. Kent, Jennifer L. Bartlett, Uta Rußmann and Amanda Beatson and has published in prestigious journals such as Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Environmental Impact Assessment Review and Public Relations Review.

In The Last Decade

Anne B. Lane

26 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by Anne B. Lane

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne B. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne B. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne B. Lane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne B. Lane

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne B. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne B. Lane. The network helps show where Anne B. Lane may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne B. Lane

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne B. Lane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne B. Lane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne B. Lane. Anne B. Lane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

#	Work	Indexed citations
1	Co-orientation on social impact: The role of perspectives 2025 ·Public Relations Review ·Kim A. Johnston, (unknown), Anne B. Lane	1
2	Towards a theory of organizational storytelling for public relations: An engagement perspective 2023 ·Public Relations Review ·Anne B. Lane	12
3	Metaphors of University Educators: The Expectation Gap with Implications for Educator Wellbeing 2023 ·Student Success ·Kim A. Johnston, Anne B. Lane	2
4	A relational approach to social impact: Moving beyond instrumental and consumer approaches 2022 ·Public Relations Review ·(unknown), Kim A. Johnston, Anne B. Lane	5
5	Two-way communication, symmetry, negative spaces, and dialogue 2021 ·Public Relations Review ·Michael L. Kent, Anne B. Lane	31
6	Mandating dialogue? International perspectives on differences between theory and practice 2019 ·Public Relations Review ·Uta Rußmann, Anne B. Lane	8
7	An authenticity matrix for community engagement 2019 ·Public Relations Review ·Kim A. Johnston, Anne B. Lane	38
8	The dialogic ladder: Toward a framework of dialogue 2019 ·Public Relations Review ·Anne B. Lane	31
9	Building relational capital: The contribution of episodic and relational community engagement 2018 ·Public Relations Review ·Kim A. Johnston, Anne B. Lane	62
10	The role of time and social churn in impact assessment: An engagement-based model 2018 ·Environmental Impact Assessment Review ·Kim A. Johnston, Anne B. Lane	14
11	If it’s so good, why not make them do it? Why true dialogue cannot be mandated 2018 ·Public Relations Review ·Anne B. Lane	27
12	Many voices: Authenticity in community engagement 2018 ·QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) ·Kim A. Johnston, Anne B. Lane	1
13	Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement in CSR: A Process Approach 2017 ·Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management ·Anne B. Lane, Bree Devin	67
14	Bridging the writing gap between student and professional: Analyzing writing education in public relations and journalism 2017 ·Public Relations Review ·Anne B. Lane, Kim A. Johnston	7
15	A rhizomatous metaphor for dialogic theory 2017 ·Public Relations Review ·Michael L. Kent, Anne B. Lane	57
16	Why dialogic principles don't make it in practice - and what we can do about it 2016 ·International journal of communication ·Anne B. Lane, Jennifer L. Bartlett	12
17	Boaty McBoatface poll shows how not to do community consultation 2016 ·Anne B. Lane	0
18	Toward understanding the (lack of?) significance of dialogue to the practice of public relations 2014 ·QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) ·Anne B. Lane	18
19	Empowering Publics: The Potential and Challenge for Public Relations Practitioners in Creative Approaches to Two-Way Symmetric Public Relations 2007 ·QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) ·Anne B. Lane	1
20	Working at the interface: The descriptive relevance of Grunig and Hunt's theories to public relations practices in south east Queensland schools. 2003 ·Brain Behavior and Evolution ·Anne B. Lane	2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact