Anne Aula

1.6k citations
26 papers · 993 indexed · h-index 17

Anne Aula

26 papers receiving 921 citations

Peers

Anne Aula
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Human-Computer Interaction 341
  • Information Systems and Management 183
  • Information Systems 444
  • Library and Information Sciences 27
  • Computer Science Applications 92
Replace Bill Kules with:
Bill Kules United States
Hilary Hutchinson United States
Carolyn Snyder United States
Melody Y. Ivory United States
Irene Lopatovska United States
Anne C. Rose United States
Uta Hinrichs United Kingdom
Joke Kort Netherlands
Jared M. Spool United States
Dennis E. Egan United States
Anne Aula relative to Bill Kules United States Bill Kules's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Bill Kules · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Aula

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Aula's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Aula with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Aula more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Aula

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Aula. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Aula. The network helps show where Anne Aula may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Anne Aula, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Aula Line = papers co-authored together Anne Aula links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20121
2 2010149
3 200916
4 200937
5 20082
6 20089
7 2008123
8 20075
9 20079
10 200716
11 200690
12 200518
13
Studying user strategies and characteristics for developing web search interfaces
200517
14 2005145
15 200445
16 200430
17
Query Formulation in Web Information Search.
200349
18
Understanding Expert Search Strategies for Designing User-Friendly Search Interfaces.
200315
19 200335
20
Combined Voluntary Gaze Direction and Facial Muscle Activity as a New Pointing Technique.
200121

About Anne Aula

Anne Aula is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Management and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 993 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (10 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (8 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (6 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (5 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Expert finding and Q&A systems (4 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (3 papers) and Service and Product Innovation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (341 citations), Information Systems and Management (183 citations) and Information Systems (444 citations). Anne Aula has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mika Käki, Zhiwei Guan, Päivi Majaranta, Kari‐Jouko Räihä, Kerry Rodden, Xin Fu, Klaus Nordhausen, Daniel M. Russell, Flavio T. P. Oliveira and I. Scott MacKenzie. Their work appears in journals such as Interacting with Computers, Information Processing & Management, First Monday, Universal Access in the Information Society and Advances in Human-Computer Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026