Minna Kulju

22 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Minna Kulju
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • General Health Professions 221
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 87
  • Applied Psychology 84
  • Human-Computer Interaction 81
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 60
Replace Ericles Andrei Bellei with:
Ericles Andrei Bellei Brazil
Daiana Biduski Brazil
Niilo Saranummi Finland
Carlos Tavares Portugal
Mattias Georgsson Sweden
Shahabeddin Abhari Iran
Belén Cruz Zapata Spain
Marcello Sarini Italy
Hannes Schlieter Germany
Erin Roehrer Australia
Minna Kulju relative to Ericles Andrei Bellei Brazil Ericles Andrei Bellei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Ericles Andrei Bellei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Minna Kulju

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minna Kulju's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minna Kulju with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minna Kulju more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minna Kulju

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minna Kulju. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minna Kulju. The network helps show where Minna Kulju may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Minna Kulju

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Minna Kulju. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Minna Kulju based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Minna Kulju. Minna Kulju is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3
D2.1 Report on the criteria, scientific areas and methodology to develop the LAC RI landscape
1
4 3
5 11
6 0
7
Time and Motion Study of Nursing-Care Services in Japan and Finland
1
8 8
9 96
10 95
11
Exploring the transformations of interaction in mobile work contexts
2
12
Finpilot2 Final report - User Acceptance of Mobile TV Services
2
13 111
14 9
15 37
16 4
17 9
18
User acceptance of a mobile diary for personal wellness management
6
19
Net in Pocket?: Personal mobile access to web services
3
20
Route guidance using a 3D city model on a mobile device
15

About Minna Kulju

Minna Kulju is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Human-Computer Interaction and Marketing, having authored 25 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers) and Service and Product Innovation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (84 citations), Family Practice (34 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (81 citations). Minna Kulju has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jaakko Lähteenmäki, Mark van Gils, Tiina Heliö, Anna‐Leena Vuorinen, Teija Vainio, J. Vainio, Raimo Lappalainen, Juha Pärkkä, Ilkka Korhonen and Juho Merilahti. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics and European Journal of Cancer Prevention.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026