Advances in Human-Computer Interaction

4.8k citations
269 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 27
    • Interactive and Immersive Displays 27
    • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts 25
    • Usability and User Interface Design 24
    • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology 16
    • Tactile and Sensory Interactions 32
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 18

Advances in Human-Computer Interaction

248 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Peers

Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Human-Computer Interaction 1.3k
  • Computer Science Applications 287
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 620
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 897
  • Social Psychology 767
Replace ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing with:
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing United States
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems United States
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces Germany
Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications United States
Human Technology Finland
New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia United States
Communication Methods and Measures United States
International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction United States
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making United States
Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences South Korea
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction relative to ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing United States ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Human-Computer Interaction more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction.

About Advances in Human-Computer Interaction

The 269 papers published in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction usually cover Human-Computer Interaction (104 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (62 papers), Information Systems and Management (22 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (32 papers) and Computer Science Applications (14 papers) specifically the topics of Tactile and Sensory Interactions (32 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (27 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (27 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (25 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (24 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (18 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (16 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction are Ghada Refaat El Said, Jacques Ophoff, Kevin Johnston, Pablo Moreno‐Ger, Silvia Coradeschi, Annica Kristoffersson, Amy Loutfi, Kiju Lee, Francesco Bellotti and Bill Kapralos.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact