Annamaria De Luca
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Exercise and Physiological Responses 22
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Muscle metabolism and nutrition 30
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 26
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders 73
- Ion channel regulation and function 72
- Physiology top 1%
- Adipose Tissue and Metabolism 35
-
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias 24
-
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies 14
- Co-authors
- Diana Conte CamerinoSabata PiernoAntonella LiantonioJean‐François DesaphyMiranda D. GroundsClaudia CamerinoGiulia Maria CamerinoHannah G. Radley‐Crabb
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)PLoS ONE (5 papers)Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Annamaria De Luca
196 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Rehabilitation 602
- Cell Biology 1.0k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 3.8k
- Physiology 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Annamaria De Luca
This map shows the geographic impact of Annamaria De Luca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annamaria De Luca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annamaria De Luca more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annamaria De Luca
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annamaria De Luca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annamaria De Luca. The network helps show where Annamaria De Luca may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Annamaria De Luca, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 101 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 56 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 26 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 31 |
About Annamaria De Luca
Annamaria De Luca is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cell Biology, having authored 201 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (73 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (72 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (35 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (30 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (26 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (24 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (22 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (602 citations), Cell Biology (1.0k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.1k citations). Annamaria De Luca has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Diana Conte Camerino, Sabata Pierno, Antonella Liantonio, Jean‐François Desaphy, Miranda D. Grounds, Claudia Camerino, Giulia Maria Camerino, Hannah G. Radley‐Crabb, Gordon S. Lynch and Michela De Bellis. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.