Neuromuscular Disorders

5.5k papers and 99.1k indexed citations

About

The 5.5k papers published in Neuromuscular Disorders in the last decades have received a total of 99.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Neuromuscular Disorders usually cover Molecular Biology (3.5k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k papers) and Genetics (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Muscle Physiology and Disorders (2.3k papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (1.0k papers) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (855 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neuromuscular Disorders are Alan E H Emery, Victor Dubowitz, Theodore L. Munsat, Sean P. Hughes, Kay E. Davies, Kate Bushby, Francesco Muntoni, Caroline A. Sewry, Carina Wallgren‐Pettersson and Michel Fardeau.

In The Last Decade

Neuromuscular Disorders

5.0k papers receiving 94.6k citations

Countries where authors publish in Neuromuscular Disorders

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neuromuscular Disorders. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neuromuscular Disorders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neuromuscular Disorders more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Neuromuscular Disorders

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neuromuscular Disorders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neuromuscular Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026