Pharmacological Research

7.9k papers and 255.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.9k papers published in Pharmacological Research in the last decades have received a total of 255.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmacological Research usually cover Molecular Biology (3.3k papers), Physiology (1.2k papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (469 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (461 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (329 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmacological Research are Robert Roskoski, Cesare R. Sirtori, William G. Wade, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Li Rao, A. S. Rao, Edward J. Calabrese, Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis, Ezio Giacobini and Lauren Amable.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pharmacological Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmacological Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmacological Research.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmacological Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmacological Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmacological Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmacological Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025