Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Manuela BarretoKristina R. OlsonJohn F. DovidioMiguel FariasGuy KahaneZoe de ToledoJames R. RaeAgata Gluszek
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (17 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers)
- Journals
- Developmental PsychologyPersonality and Individual DifferencesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomPortugal
In The Last Decade
Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser
26 papers receiving 916 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Sociology and Political Science 616
- Social Psychology 454
- Cognitive Neuroscience 157
- Clinical Psychology 132
- Gender Studies 128
Countries citing papers authored by Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser. The network helps show where Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser. Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 69 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 207 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 74 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 143 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 127 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 51 |
About Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser
Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 957 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (17 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (454 citations), Sociology and Political Science (616 citations) and Gender Studies (128 citations). Anna‐Kaisa Newheiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Manuela Barreto, Kristina R. Olson, John F. Dovidio, Miguel Farias, Guy Kahane, Zoe de Toledo, James R. Rae, Agata Gluszek, Yarrow Dunham and Miles Hewstone. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.