Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification
1988611 citationsVincent Yzerbyt, Jacques‐Philippe Leyens et al.profile →
The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups
2000585 citationsJacques‐Philippe Leyens, Maria Paola Paladino et al.profile →
Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three european countries.
2009547 citationsJens Binder, Hanna Zagefka et al.Journal of Personality and Social Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jacques‐Philippe Leyens
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacques‐Philippe Leyens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacques‐Philippe Leyens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacques‐Philippe Leyens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacques‐Philippe Leyens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacques‐Philippe Leyens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacques‐Philippe Leyens. The network helps show where Jacques‐Philippe Leyens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacques‐Philippe Leyens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacques‐Philippe Leyens.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacques‐Philippe Leyens based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jacques‐Philippe Leyens. Jacques‐Philippe Leyens is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pérez, Armando Rodríguez, Naira Delgado, Verónica Betancor, Jacques‐Philippe Leyens, & Jeroen Vaes. (2011). Infra-humanization of outgroups throughout the world. The role of similarity, intergroup friendship, knowledge of the outgroup, and status. Anales de Psicología. 27(3). 679–687.33 indexed citations
2.
Binder, Jens, Hanna Zagefka, Rupert Brown, et al.. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three european countries.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 96(4). 843–856.547 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Betancor, Verónica, et al.. (2005). El efecto del estatus en la atribución de las dimensiones estereotípicas de sociabilidad y competencia. Psicothema. 17(2). 297–302.8 indexed citations
Paladino, Maria Paola, Jeroen Vaes, Emanuele Castano, Stéphanie Demoulin, & Jacques‐Philippe Leyens. (2004). Emotional infra-humanization in intergroup relations : The role of national identification in the attribution of primary and secondary emotions to Italians and Germans. Florence Research (University of Florence). 22. 519–536.20 indexed citations
6.
Vaes, Jeroen, Maria Paola Paladino, & Jacques‐Philippe Leyens. (2004). Perspective taking in an intergroup context and the use of uniquely human emotions: Drawing an E on your forehead. Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento). 17(3). 5–26.20 indexed citations
7.
Gaunt, Ruth, et al.. (2004). Motivated reasoning and the attribution of emotions to ingroup and outgroup. Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln). 17(1). 5–20.12 indexed citations
8.
Croizet, Jean‐Claude & Jacques‐Philippe Leyens. (2003). Mauvaises réputations : réalités et enjeux de la stigmatisation sociale. A. Colin eBooks.20 indexed citations
9.
Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe, et al.. (2003). El género como criterio de pertenencia grupal y las atribuciones al prejuicio. Psicothema. 15(1). 65–70.3 indexed citations
Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe, et al.. (2001). Atribuciones a situaciones de interacción ambiguas: el punto de vista de la víctima y del agente del prejuicio. Psicothema. 13(4). 557–562.8 indexed citations
12.
Yzerbyt, Vincent, Georges Schadron, & Jacques‐Philippe Leyens. (1997). Social judgeability concerns and the dilution of stereotypes. Swiss Journal of Psychology. 56(2). 95–105.4 indexed citations
13.
Dardenne, Benoît, Jacques‐Philippe Leyens, & Vincent Yzerbyt. (1997). Recherche d'information et pragmatisme : II. Utilité sociale de la confirmation d'hypothèses. L’Année psychologique. 97.1 indexed citations
14.
Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe & Jean‐Léon Beauvois. (1997). L'ère de la cognition. Presses universitaires de Grenoble eBooks.3 indexed citations
15.
Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe & Benoît Dardenne. (1996). Basic concepts and approaches in social cognition. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).11 indexed citations
16.
Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe & Benoît Dardenne. (1994). La perception et connaissance d'autrui. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.