Annabel Williams
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Meriel NorrisJohn A. HammondClaudia Cristina Ortega GonzálezGiorgia D’InnocenzoDaniel T. BishopElizabeth CassidyPaul LarkinDonna O’Connor
- Topics
- Global Health Workforce Issues (5 papers)Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (5 papers)Medical Education and Admissions (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Annabel Williams
18 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 72
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 53
- Social Psychology 48
- Sociology and Political Science 40
- General Health Professions 35
Countries citing papers authored by Annabel Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Annabel Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabel Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabel Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annabel Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabel Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabel Williams. The network helps show where Annabel Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annabel Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annabel Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annabel Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annabel Williams. Annabel Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | Keeping what works: remote consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic | 31 |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | The Grampian Hospitals Drug Formulary. | 2 |
About Annabel Williams
Annabel Williams is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Emergency Medical Services and Family Practice, having authored 21 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Workforce Issues (5 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (5 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (20 citations), Research and Theory (4 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (53 citations). Annabel Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Meriel Norris, John A. Hammond, Claudia Cristina Ortega González, Giorgia D’Innocenzo, Daniel T. Bishop, Elizabeth Cassidy, Paul Larkin, Donna O’Connor, A. L. Pope and Lauren A. Gardner. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Sports Sciences and Psychology of sport and exercise.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.