Elizabeth King

1.7k total citations
48 papers, 917 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth King is a scholar working on Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth King has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 917 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 7 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth King's work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (6 papers) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (5 papers). Elizabeth King is often cited by papers focused on Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (6 papers) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (5 papers). Elizabeth King collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Elizabeth King's co-authors include Dorry L. Segev, Mara McAdams‐DeMarco, Niraj M. Desai, Jeremy Walston, Ravi Varadhan, Natasha Gupta, Babak J. Orandi, Megan L. Salter, Nada Alachkar and Amanda J. Law and has published in prestigious journals such as Hepatology, European Respiratory Journal and Transplantation.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth King

44 papers receiving 900 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth King United Kingdom 17 229 205 197 150 147 48 917
Jill M. Gelow United States 26 190 0.8× 591 2.9× 232 1.2× 33 0.2× 71 0.5× 56 1.9k
Nadia M. Chu United States 21 368 1.6× 189 0.9× 487 2.5× 610 4.1× 262 1.8× 68 1.3k
Thomas J. Wilkinson United Kingdom 23 735 3.2× 327 1.6× 182 0.9× 920 6.1× 72 0.5× 97 1.8k
Joanne B. Krasnoff United States 21 536 2.3× 296 1.4× 38 0.2× 330 2.2× 142 1.0× 30 1.7k
Usama Feroze United States 17 309 1.3× 147 0.7× 43 0.2× 725 4.8× 34 0.2× 19 1.2k
Courtney J. Lightfoot United Kingdom 13 205 0.9× 122 0.6× 56 0.3× 317 2.1× 37 0.3× 52 698
Theresa A. McDonagh United Kingdom 24 182 0.8× 329 1.6× 41 0.2× 215 1.4× 22 0.1× 48 2.4k
Wendy L. Cook Canada 16 206 0.9× 152 0.7× 160 0.8× 403 2.7× 13 0.1× 26 1.1k
Güneş Arık Türkiye 13 539 2.4× 103 0.5× 241 1.2× 54 0.4× 11 0.1× 31 807
Tania Janaudis‐Ferreira Canada 23 260 1.1× 327 1.6× 41 0.2× 98 0.7× 146 1.0× 91 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth King. The network helps show where Elizabeth King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth King. Elizabeth King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gustafson, Owen, Elizabeth King, Michael Maia Schlüssel, et al.. (2024). The impact of musculoskeletal ill health on quality of life and function after critical care: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Anaesthesia. 79(8). 821–828. 3 indexed citations
2.
Durand, Christine M., Hannah C. Sung, Olivia S. Kates, et al.. (2024). Building a successful transplant research center: Blueprints and barriers. Transplant Infectious Disease. 26(6). e14373–e14373. 1 indexed citations
3.
4.
King, Elizabeth, et al.. (2023). Exploring individual character traits and behaviours of clinical academic allied health professionals: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 23(1). 1025–1025. 6 indexed citations
5.
Nucci, Anita, et al.. (2023). Nutrition support considerations in pediatric small bowel transplantation. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 39(1). 75–85. 1 indexed citations
6.
Gustafson, Owen, Elizabeth King, Michael Maia Schlüssel, et al.. (2023). Musculoskeletal health state and physical function of intensive care unit survivors: protocol for a UK multicentre prospective cohort study (the MSK-ICU study). BMJ Open. 13(2). e071385–e071385. 5 indexed citations
7.
McWilliams, David, Elizabeth King, Peter Nydahl, et al.. (2023). Mobilisation in the EveNing to TreAt deLirium (MENTAL): protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 13(2). e066143–e066143. 2 indexed citations
8.
Wang, Melinda, Amy M. Shui, Jessica M. Ruck, et al.. (2023). The liver frailty index is a predictor of healthcare utilization after liver transplantation in older adults. Clinical Transplantation. 38(1). e15219–e15219. 5 indexed citations
9.
King, Elizabeth, et al.. (2023). Allied health professionals’ research capacity: open to interpretation?. BMC Health Services Research. 23(1). 640–640. 2 indexed citations
10.
King, Elizabeth, Owen Gustafson, Annabel Williams, et al.. (2022). Life after critical illness: a systematic review and thematic synthesis protocol. 140–147.
11.
King, Elizabeth, et al.. (2022). Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation. BMC Health Services Research. 22(1). 85–85. 39 indexed citations
12.
Areia, Carlos, Elizabeth King, Louise Young, et al.. (2021). Experiences of current vital signs monitoring practices and views of wearable monitoring: A qualitative study in patients and nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 78(3). 810–822. 29 indexed citations
13.
Areia, Carlos, Mauro Santos, Sarah Vollam, et al.. (2021). A Chest Patch for Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring: Clinical Validation Study During Movement and Controlled Hypoxia. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(9). e27547–e27547. 20 indexed citations
14.
15.
Pandian, Vinciya, Brian J. Barnes, Elizabeth King, et al.. (2020). The Trach Trail: A Systems‐Based Pathway to Improve Quality of Tracheostomy Care and Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Otolaryngology. 163(2). 232–243. 26 indexed citations
16.
Rasmussen, Sarah E. Van Pilsum, Fatima Warsame, Hao Ying, et al.. (2018). Engaging clinicians and patients to assess and improve frailty measurement in adults with end stage renal disease. BMC Nephrology. 19(1). 8–8. 29 indexed citations
17.
King, Elizabeth, et al.. (2015). Hub and spoke model for nursing student placements in the UK. Nursing Children and Young People. 27(2). 24–29. 12 indexed citations
18.
Shah, Suharsh, Elizabeth King, & Robert Newton. (2013). Inhibition of inflammatory gene expression by dexamethasone partly depends on the phosphatase, MKP-1 (DUSP1). European Respiratory Journal. 42(Suppl 57). P730–P730. 1 indexed citations
19.
Rolfson, Darryl, Gordon Wilcock, Arnold Mitnitski, et al.. (2013). An assessment of neurocognitive speed in relation to frailty. Age and Ageing. 42(2). 191–196. 25 indexed citations
20.
Oulhaj, Abderrahim, Helga Refsum, Helen Beaumont, et al.. (2009). Homocysteine as a predictor of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 25(1). 82–90. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jill M. Gelow Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nadia M. Chu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas J. Wilkinson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joanne B. Krasnoff Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Usama Feroze Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Courtney J. Lightfoot Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Theresa A. McDonagh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wendy L. Cook Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Güneş Arık Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tania Janaudis‐Ferreira
Rankless by CCL
2026