Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems
2017385 citationsRuth Madigan, Tyron Louw et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Schieben's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Schieben with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Schieben more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Schieben. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Schieben. The network helps show where Anna Schieben may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Schieben
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Schieben.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Schieben based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Schieben. Anna Schieben is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schieben, Anna, et al.. (2019). Light-based communication of automated vehicles with other traffic participants - a usability study in a Virtual Reality environment. elib (German Aerospace Center).3 indexed citations
Schieben, Anna, Marc Wilbrink, Carmen Kettwich, et al.. (2018). Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: A design framework based on human needs and expectations. elib (German Aerospace Center).8 indexed citations
7.
Dey, Debargha, Azra Habibovic, Maria Klingegård, et al.. (2018). Workshop on Methodology. TU/e Research Portal. 17–22.8 indexed citations
8.
Wilbrink, Marc, Anna Schieben, Florian Weber, et al.. (2017). D1.1 Definition of interACT use cases and scenarios. elib (German Aerospace Center).2 indexed citations
9.
Dziennus, Marc, Johann Kelsch, & Anna Schieben. (2016). Ambient light based interaction concept for an integrative driver assistance System- SAE2-3. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
Hesse, Tobias, et al.. (2013). Interaction design for automation initiated steering manoeuvres for collision avoidance. mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich).8 indexed citations
Schieben, Anna, et al.. (2010). Intermediate results of the Human Factors work in the EU-Project HAVEit: Interaction design and simulator testing of the Joint System for highly automated vehicles. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
17.
Schieben, Anna, Matthias Heesen, Julian Schindler, Johann Kelsch, & Frank Flemisch. (2009). The theater-system technique. 43–46.37 indexed citations
Flemisch, Frank, et al.. (2006). Erwartungsbasierte Gestaltung mit der Theatersystem- / Wizard-Of-Oz-Technik am Beispiel eines haptischen Assistenzsystems. elib (German Aerospace Center).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.