Angelique Day
- Safety Research top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Co-authors
- Amy DamashekAmy DworskyKieran J. FogartyCheryl L. SomersRosalind KirkJoanne RiebschlegerShantel CrosbySuzanne Cross
- Topics
- Child Welfare and Adoption (55 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (27 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Angelique Day
66 papers receiving 869 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Safety Research 668
- Clinical Psychology 536
- Sociology and Political Science 317
- General Health Professions 203
- Education 173
Countries citing papers authored by Angelique Day
This map shows the geographic impact of Angelique Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angelique Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angelique Day more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angelique Day
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angelique Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angelique Day. The network helps show where Angelique Day may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angelique Day
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angelique Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angelique Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Angelique Day. Angelique Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | Challenges to recruit and retain American Indian and Alaskan Natives into social work programs: the impact on the child welfare workforce. | 13 |
| 16 | When does Confidentiality become an impediment rather than a pathway to meeting the educational needs of students in the foster care system | 5 |
| 17 | An Analysis of Foster Care Placement History and Post-Secondary Graduation Rates. | 16 |
| 18 | 71 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | The Power of Social Support Mentoring and Resilience | 11 |
About Angelique Day
Angelique Day is a scholar working on Safety Research, Clinical Psychology and Public Administration, having authored 78 papers that have together received 958 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (55 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (27 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (668 citations), Clinical Psychology (536 citations) and Speech and Hearing (71 citations). Angelique Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Amy Damashek, Amy Dworsky, Kieran J. Fogarty, Cheryl L. Somers, Rosalind Kirk, Joanne Riebschleger, Shantel Crosby, Suzanne Cross, Lisa Schelbe and Megan Hayes Piel. Their work appears in journals such as SLEEP, Development and Psychopathology and Journal of Adolescent Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.