Anelis Kaiser

21 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

Anelis Kaiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 265
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 120
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 105
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 94
  • Social Psychology 82
Replace Zohar Berman with:
Zohar Berman Israel
Sebastian Urchs Canada
Francesco Bianchi‐Demicheli Switzerland
Katrina L. Grasby Australia
Andrew J. Freeman United States
Janna van Belle Netherlands
Birim Günay Kılıç Türkiye
Junya Fujino Japan
Natalie M. Gallagher United States
Nicole Nowak United States
Anelis Kaiser relative to Zohar Berman Israel Zohar Berman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Zohar Berman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anelis Kaiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anelis Kaiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anelis Kaiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anelis Kaiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anelis Kaiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anelis Kaiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anelis Kaiser. The network helps show where Anelis Kaiser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anelis Kaiser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anelis Kaiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anelis Kaiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anelis Kaiser. Anelis Kaiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 11
4 4
5 8
6
Feminist interventions on the sex/gender question in neuroimaging research
4
7
Feminist and Queer Repoliticizations of the Brain.
2
8 16
9
Why Males ≠ Corvettes, Females ≠ Volvos, and Scientific Criticism ≠ Ideology: A Response to “Equal ≠ The Same: Sex Differences in the Human Brain” by Larry Cahill in Cerebrum
10
10 53
11 116
12 51
13 1
14 42
15 14
16 105
17 3
18 49
19
Gender in Motion : die Konstruktion von Geschlecht in Raum und Erzählung
1
20 41

About Anelis Kaiser

Anelis Kaiser is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Cognitive Neuroscience and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (6 papers), Sex and Gender in Healthcare (5 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (265 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (120 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (28 citations). Anelis Kaiser has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cordula Nitsch, Rebecca Jordan‐Young, Cordelia Fine, Gina Rippon, Sven Haller, Sigrid Schmitz, Esther Kuenzli, Thomas Dierks, Maria Stein and Ernst‐Wilhelm Radue. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Brain Research and Neuropsychologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026