Cordelia Fine
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- James BlairAgnès NairnJim LumsdenJillian CraigieIan GoldJeanette KennettMark GardnerAnelis Kaiser
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers)Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Cordelia Fine
34 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Cognitive Neuroscience 543
- Psychiatry and Mental health 304
- Social Psychology 260
- Sociology and Political Science 248
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 243
Countries citing papers authored by Cordelia Fine
This map shows the geographic impact of Cordelia Fine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cordelia Fine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cordelia Fine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cordelia Fine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cordelia Fine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cordelia Fine. The network helps show where Cordelia Fine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cordelia Fine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cordelia Fine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cordelia Fine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cordelia Fine. Cordelia Fine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Eight Things You Need to Know About Sex, Gender, Brains, and Behavior: A Guide for Academics, Journalists, Parents, Gender Diversity Advocates, Social Justice Warriors, Tweeters, Facebookers, and Everyone Else | 5 |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | Why Males ≠ Corvettes, Females ≠ Volvos, and Scientific Criticism ≠ Ideology: A Response to “Equal ≠ The Same: Sex Differences in the Human Brain” by Larry Cahill in Cerebrum | 10 |
| 5 | 116 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | From Scanner to Sound Bite: Issues in Interpreting and Reporting Sex Differences in the Brain | 3 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 235 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | Damned If You Do; Damned If You Don't: The Impasse in Cognitive Accounts of the Capgras Delusion | 9 |
| 14 | The Explanation Approach to Delusion | 5 |
| 15 | 66 | |
| 16 | 200 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 42 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Cordelia Fine
Cordelia Fine is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Gastroenterology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (543 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (304 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (243 citations). Cordelia Fine has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include James Blair, Agnès Nairn, Jim Lumsden, Jillian Craigie, Ian Gold, Jeanette Kennett, Mark Gardner, Anelis Kaiser, Rebecca Jordan‐Young and Gina Rippon. Their work appears in journals such as Science, The Lancet and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.