Natalie M. Gallagher
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Adam E. GreenKristina R. OlsonLily DurwoodGalen V. BodenhausenAaron DevorRachel HortonAdam B. WeinbergerPeter E. Turkeltaub
- Topics
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (9 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers)Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Natalie M. Gallagher
21 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Social Psychology 158
- Cognitive Neuroscience 122
- Sociology and Political Science 81
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 76
- Gender Studies 66
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie M. Gallagher
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie M. Gallagher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie M. Gallagher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie M. Gallagher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie M. Gallagher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie M. Gallagher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie M. Gallagher. The network helps show where Natalie M. Gallagher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie M. Gallagher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie M. Gallagher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie M. Gallagher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie M. Gallagher. Natalie M. Gallagher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 85 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | Stereotypes of Transgender Categories: Attributes and Lay Theories. | 1 |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 58 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Natalie M. Gallagher
Natalie M. Gallagher is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Gender Studies and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (158 citations), Gender Studies (66 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (122 citations). Natalie M. Gallagher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Adam E. Green, Kristina R. Olson, Lily Durwood, Galen V. Bodenhausen, Aaron Devor, Rachel Horton, Adam B. Weinberger, Peter E. Turkeltaub, Evan J. Giangrande and Joseph H. Callicott. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.