Andrew Vogt
- Transportation top 10%
- Building and Construction top 10%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Advanced Mathematical Theories 3
-
- Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation 3
-
- Quantum Mechanics and Applications 3
-
- Mathematics and Applications 3
-
- Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications 3
-
- Optimization and Variational Analysis 2
- Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering 2
-
- Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics 2
- Co-authors
- Joe BaredPaul CullPaul C. KainenVěra KůrkováRobert de LevieDavid S. CarterJohn Edward GrayJerome A. Goldstein
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Andrew Vogt
26 papers receiving 469 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 210
- Transportation 60
- Building and Construction 77
- Algebra and Number Theory 26
- Mathematical Physics 45
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Vogt
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Vogt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Vogt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Vogt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Vogt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Vogt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Vogt. The network helps show where Andrew Vogt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Vogt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 4 | Longitudinal Surveys versus Continuous Surveys and Surveys with Flexible Periodicity | 2009 | 0 |
| 5 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 26 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 230 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 15 | |
| 15 | Finite differences: a computer-based alternative to calculus | 1988 | 1 |
| 16 | 1980 | 20 | |
| 17 | 1980 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1976 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1974 | 30 | |
| 20 | 1972 | 3 |
About Andrew Vogt
Andrew Vogt is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Numerical Analysis and Architecture, having authored 30 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (3 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories (3 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Mathematics and Applications (3 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (3 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (2 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (2 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (210 citations), Transportation (60 citations) and Building and Construction (77 citations). Andrew Vogt has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Joe Bared, Paul Cull, Paul C. Kainen, Věra Kůrková, Robert de Levie, David S. Carter, John Edward Gray, Jerome A. Goldstein, Shinnosuke Ôharu and James T. Sandefur.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.