Andrew Simpson

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
36 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Andrew Simpson is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Simpson has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 13 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Andrew Simpson's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (23 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (8 papers). Andrew Simpson is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (23 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (8 papers). Andrew Simpson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Andrew Simpson's co-authors include Kevin J. Riggs, Nicholas R. Cooper, Katarzyna Kostyrka‐Allchorne, Richard Freeman, Daniel J. Carroll, Ludovic Ferrand, Mark A. Atkinson, Geoff G. Cole, Richard P. Jolley and Thomas D. Potts and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Child Development and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Simpson

35 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

The relationship between television exposure and children... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Simpson United Kingdom 19 446 420 402 247 178 36 1.1k
Janet J. Boseovski United States 15 544 1.2× 380 0.9× 946 2.4× 259 1.0× 311 1.7× 37 1.5k
Ciping Deng China 19 211 0.5× 483 1.1× 341 0.8× 152 0.6× 229 1.3× 45 1.2k
Emily J. Hopkins United States 13 195 0.4× 667 1.6× 401 1.0× 178 0.7× 86 0.5× 18 1.1k
Hwajin Yang Singapore 19 638 1.4× 239 0.6× 546 1.4× 317 1.3× 302 1.7× 60 1.3k
Clare Wood United Kingdom 26 404 0.9× 912 2.2× 1.1k 2.7× 208 0.8× 165 0.9× 75 1.9k
Joshua Flavell Australia 7 372 0.8× 262 0.6× 711 1.8× 65 0.3× 247 1.4× 13 1.1k
Ulrich Weger Germany 19 601 1.3× 348 0.8× 499 1.2× 96 0.4× 335 1.9× 59 1.4k
Kelly B. Cartwright United States 20 382 0.9× 496 1.2× 1.0k 2.5× 57 0.2× 162 0.9× 44 1.4k
Judith H. Danovitch United States 19 322 0.7× 370 0.9× 500 1.2× 216 0.9× 161 0.9× 55 1.1k
Judith E. Sims‐Knight United States 18 257 0.6× 146 0.3× 387 1.0× 248 1.0× 166 0.9× 44 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Simpson. The network helps show where Andrew Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Simpson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Simpson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Simpson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Simpson. Andrew Simpson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Holmboe, Karla, et al.. (2021). The early childhood inhibitory touchscreen task: A new measure of response inhibition in toddlerhood and across the lifespan. PLoS ONE. 16(12). e0260695–e0260695. 23 indexed citations
2.
Kostyrka‐Allchorne, Katarzyna, Nicholas R. Cooper, Andrew Simpson, & Edmund Sonuga‐Barke. (2020). Children’s mental health and recreation: Limited evidence for associations with screen use. Acta Paediatrica. 109(12). 2648–2655. 11 indexed citations
3.
Geeraert, Nicolas, et al.. (2019). Never Mind the Acculturation Gap: Migrant Youth’s Wellbeing Benefit when They Retain Their Heritage Culture but Their Parents Adopt the Settlement Culture. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 49(2). 520–533. 24 indexed citations
4.
Simpson, Andrew & Daniel J. Carroll. (2019). Understanding Early Inhibitory Development: Distinguishing Two Ways That Children Use Inhibitory Control. Child Development. 90(5). 1459–1473. 26 indexed citations
5.
Atkinson, Mark A., et al.. (2018). How social is social inhibition of return?. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 80(8). 1892–1903. 6 indexed citations
6.
Simpson, Andrew, et al.. (2017). Where does prepotency come from on developmental tests of inhibitory control?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 162. 18–30. 4 indexed citations
7.
Simpson, Andrew & Daniel J. Carroll. (2017). Young children can overcome their weak inhibitory control, if they conceptualize a task in the right way. Cognition. 170. 270–279.
8.
Mather, Emily, et al.. (2016). Get Your Facts Right: Preschoolers Systematically Extend Both Object Names and Category-Relevant Facts. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 1064–1064. 3 indexed citations
9.
Cox, Sharon, Chris Chandler, Andrew Simpson, & Kevin J. Riggs. (2016). The effect of alcohol dependence on automatic visuo-spatial perspective taking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 166. 21–25. 7 indexed citations
10.
Simpson, Andrew, et al.. (2015). Young children retain fast mapped object labels better than shape, color, and texture words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 134. 1–11. 12 indexed citations
11.
Simpson, Andrew & Daniel J. Carroll. (2014). What’s so special about verbal imitation? Investigating the effect of modality on automaticity in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 121. 1–11. 2 indexed citations
12.
Atkinson, Mark A., et al.. (2014). Is social inhibition of return due to action co-representation?. Acta Psychologica. 150. 85–93. 21 indexed citations
13.
Simpson, Andrew, Nicholas R. Cooper, Helge Gillmeister, & Kevin J. Riggs. (2013). Seeing triggers acting, hearing does not trigger saying: Evidence from children’s weak inhibition. Cognition. 128(2). 103–112. 6 indexed citations
15.
Riggs, Kevin J., Richard P. Jolley, & Andrew Simpson. (2013). The role of inhibitory control in the development of human figure drawing in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 114(4). 537–542. 28 indexed citations
16.
Simpson, Andrew & Kevin J. Riggs. (2011). Under what conditions do children have difficulty in inhibiting imitation? Evidence for the importance of planning specific responses. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 109(4). 512–524. 12 indexed citations
17.
Simpson, Andrew, et al.. (2011). Refining the understanding of inhibitory processes: how response prepotency is created and overcome. Developmental Science. 15(1). 62–73. 67 indexed citations
18.
Riggs, Kevin J., Andrew Simpson, & Thomas D. Potts. (2011). The development of visual short-term memory for multifeature items during middle childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 108(4). 802–809. 34 indexed citations
19.
Riggs, Kevin J., et al.. (2006). Changes in the capacity of visual working memory in 5- to 10-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 95(1). 18–26. 115 indexed citations
20.
Simpson, Andrew & Kevin J. Riggs. (2005). Factors responsible for performance on the day–night task: response set or semantics?. Developmental Science. 8(4). 360–371. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026