Andrew Livermore
- Sensory Systems top 0.2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Food Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- David G. LaingThomas HummelGerd KobalAngela MüllerHeinz ReichmannCornelia HummelJohannes FrasnelliCharles D. Derby
- Topics
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (13 papers)Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (11 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers)
- Journals
- Cellular and Molecular Life SciencesJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Andrew Livermore
13 papers receiving 995 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Sensory Systems 877
- Biomedical Engineering 552
- Nutrition and Dietetics 504
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 252
- Food Science 106
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Livermore
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Livermore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Livermore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Livermore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Livermore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Livermore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Livermore. The network helps show where Andrew Livermore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Livermore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Livermore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Livermore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Livermore. Andrew Livermore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 50 | |
| 3 | 120 | |
| 4 | 163 | |
| 5 | Comparison of lateralized and binasal olfactory thresholds. | 37 |
| 6 | 78 | |
| 7 | 79 | |
| 8 | 41 | |
| 9 | 137 | |
| 10 | 120 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 81 | |
| 13 | 106 |
About Andrew Livermore
Andrew Livermore is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (13 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (11 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (877 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (504 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (252 citations). Andrew Livermore has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include David G. Laing, Thomas Hummel, Gerd Kobal, Angela Müller, Heinz Reichmann, Cornelia Hummel, Johannes Frasnelli, Charles D. Derby and E. Pauli. Their work appears in journals such as Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.