Anthony L Jinks

1.3k total citations
28 papers, 945 citations indexed

About

Anthony L Jinks is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Biomedical Engineering and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Anthony L Jinks has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 945 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Sensory Systems, 18 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 16 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Anthony L Jinks's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (24 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (18 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (16 papers). Anthony L Jinks is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (24 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (18 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (16 papers). Anthony L Jinks collaborates with scholars based in Australia and Italy. Anthony L Jinks's co-authors include David G. Laing, Iain S. McGregor, Ian Hutchinson, James E. Hayes, Thomas Hummel, Elizabeth C. Temple, Erminio Monteleone, Nicholas Oram, Richard J. Stevenson and Gad Kainer and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Trends in Food Science & Technology.

In The Last Decade

Anthony L Jinks

26 papers receiving 921 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anthony L Jinks Australia 15 563 450 372 226 133 28 945
Simona Negoias Germany 19 1.2k 2.1× 636 1.4× 657 1.8× 145 0.6× 106 0.8× 41 1.4k
Maria G. Veldhuizen United States 25 860 1.5× 962 2.1× 280 0.8× 214 0.9× 220 1.7× 50 2.0k
Christian H. Lemon United States 17 518 0.9× 479 1.1× 182 0.5× 200 0.9× 34 0.3× 28 755
R. Kopietz Germany 14 535 1.0× 291 0.6× 272 0.7× 100 0.4× 48 0.4× 17 1.0k
Julie Hudry Switzerland 18 541 1.0× 363 0.8× 250 0.7× 98 0.4× 122 0.9× 27 925
Mikiko Kadohisa United Kingdom 13 699 1.2× 488 1.1× 250 0.7× 305 1.3× 54 0.4× 21 1.1k
Valentina Parma Italy 19 627 1.1× 273 0.6× 357 1.0× 72 0.3× 69 0.5× 59 1.1k
Eugene R. Delay United States 19 576 1.0× 553 1.2× 354 1.0× 210 0.9× 23 0.2× 58 1.0k
Vincent Farget France 10 693 1.2× 300 0.7× 353 0.9× 176 0.8× 88 0.7× 10 777
Janina Seubert United States 20 859 1.5× 474 1.1× 435 1.2× 87 0.4× 51 0.4× 34 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Anthony L Jinks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony L Jinks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony L Jinks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony L Jinks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony L Jinks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony L Jinks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony L Jinks. The network helps show where Anthony L Jinks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony L Jinks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony L Jinks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony L Jinks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony L Jinks. Anthony L Jinks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Laing, David G., et al.. (2021). Chemosensory Loss during a Traumatic Brain Injury Suggests a Central Pathway for the Rehabilitation of Anosmia. Chemical Senses. 46. 2 indexed citations
2.
Laing, David G., et al.. (2017). Taste-Elicited Activity in Facial Muscle Regions in 5–8-Week-Old Infants. Chemical Senses. 42(5). 443–453. 5 indexed citations
3.
Laing, David G., et al.. (2015). Reduced taste function and taste papillae density in children with chronic kidney disease. Pediatric Nephrology. 30(11). 2003–2010. 10 indexed citations
4.
Hutchinson, Ian, et al.. (2013). Changes in Fungiform Papillae Density During Development in Humans. Chemical Senses. 38(6). 519–527. 35 indexed citations
5.
Jinks, Anthony L. (2012). Paranormal and alternative health beliefs as quasi- beliefs: Implications for item content in paranormal belief questionnaires. 12(2). 127–158. 4 indexed citations
6.
Hayes, James E. & Anthony L Jinks. (2012). Evaluation of smoking on olfactory thresholds of phenyl ethyl alcohol and n-butanol. Physiology & Behavior. 107(2). 177–180. 25 indexed citations
7.
Jinks, Anthony L. (2011). An Introduction to the Psychology of Paranormal Belief and Experience. 1 indexed citations
8.
Laing, David G., et al.. (2010). Chemosensory function and food preferences of children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatric Pulmonology. 45(8). 807–815. 11 indexed citations
9.
Laing, David G., et al.. (2009). Temporal processing of olfactory stimuli during retronasal perception. Behavioural Brain Research. 200(1). 68–75. 17 indexed citations
10.
Hutchinson, Ian, et al.. (2007). Facial Electromyography: Responses of Children to Odor and Taste Stimuli. Chemical Senses. 32(6). 611–621. 35 indexed citations
11.
Hutchinson, Ian, et al.. (2005). Rapid quantitative assessment of fungiform papillae density in the human tongue. Brain Research. 1052(2). 196–201. 87 indexed citations
12.
James, Clara E., David G. Laing, Anthony L Jinks, Nicholas Oram, & Ian Hutchinson. (2003). Taste response functions of adults and children using different rating scales. Food Quality and Preference. 15(1). 77–82. 9 indexed citations
13.
Temple, Elizabeth C., Ian Hutchinson, David G. Laing, & Anthony L Jinks. (2002). Taste development: differential growth rates of tongue regions in humans. Developmental Brain Research. 135(1-2). 65–70. 24 indexed citations
14.
Hutchinson, Ian, et al.. (2002). A quantitative study of fungiform papillae and taste pore density in adults and children. Developmental Brain Research. 138(2). 135–146. 71 indexed citations
15.
Jinks, Anthony L, David G. Laing, & Ian Hutchinson. (2001). A psychophysical study of the relationship between temporal processing in odor mixtures and transduction pathways. Cognitive Brain Research. 12(2). 273–288. 4 indexed citations
16.
Jinks, Anthony L & David G. Laing. (2001). The analysis of odor mixtures by humans: evidence for a configurational process. Physiology & Behavior. 72(1-2). 51–63. 102 indexed citations
17.
Jinks, Anthony L & David G. Laing. (1999). Temporal processing reveals a mechanism for limiting the capacity of humans to analyze odor mixtures. Cognitive Brain Research. 8(3). 311–325. 35 indexed citations
18.
Jinks, Anthony L & David G. Laing. (1999). A Limit in the Processing of Components in Odour Mixtures. Perception. 28(3). 395–404. 77 indexed citations
19.
Jinks, Anthony L, David G. Laing, Ian Hutchinson, & Nicholas Oram. (1998). Temporal Processing of Odor Mixtures Reveals That Identification of Components Takes Precedence over Temporal Information in Olfactory Memorya. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 855(1). 834–836. 4 indexed citations
20.
Jinks, Anthony L & Iain S. McGregor. (1997). Modulation of anxiety-related behaviours following lesions of the prelimbic or infralimbic cortex in the rat. Brain Research. 772(1-2). 181–190. 193 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026