Andrew Kimmel
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Biomedical Engineering
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Kostas E. BekrisLarry E. MagargalAbdeslam BoulariasAndrew DobsonRahul ShomeShaojun ZhuJames C. FolkAvishai Sintov
- Topics
- Robot Manipulation and Learning (9 papers)Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (5 papers)Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilIsrael
In The Last Decade
Andrew Kimmel
24 papers receiving 222 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Ophthalmology 76
- Control and Systems Engineering 75
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 52
- Biomedical Engineering 39
- Genetics 33
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Kimmel
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Kimmel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Kimmel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Kimmel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Kimmel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Kimmel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Kimmel. The network helps show where Andrew Kimmel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Kimmel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Kimmel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Kimmel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Kimmel. Andrew Kimmel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tools for Data-driven Modeling of Within-Hand Manipulation with Underactuated Adaptive Hands. | 2 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | Model Identification via Physics Engines for Improved Policy Search. | 6 |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | WiELD-CAVE: Wireless Ergonomic Lightweight Device for use in the CAVE. | 1 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | Progressive capillary nonperfusion in temporal branch retinal vein obstruction. | 2 |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | Proliferative sickle cell retinopathy under age 20: a review. | 5 |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Andrew Kimmel
Andrew Kimmel is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Control and Systems Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 24 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robot Manipulation and Learning (9 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (5 papers) and Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (76 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (75 citations) and Genetics (33 citations). Andrew Kimmel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Kostas E. Bekris, Larry E. Magargal, Abdeslam Boularias, Andrew Dobson, Rahul Shome, Shaojun Zhu, James C. Folk, Avishai Sintov, William H. Annesley and Tushar Patel. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Retina.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.