William H. Annesley
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jerry A. ShieldsGary C. BrownLarry A. DonosoTamara R. VrabecArcilee FrostJay L. FedermanWilliam E. BensonLarry E. Magargal
- Topics
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments (18 papers)Retinal and Macular Surgery (14 papers)Retinal and Optic Conditions (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesLebanon
In The Last Decade
William H. Annesley
39 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Ophthalmology 865
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 546
- Molecular Biology 310
- Genetics 161
- Neurology 158
Countries citing papers authored by William H. Annesley
This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Annesley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Annesley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Annesley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Annesley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Annesley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Annesley. The network helps show where William H. Annesley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Annesley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Annesley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Annesley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Annesley. William H. Annesley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 158 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 71 | |
| 9 | Central retinal vein occlusion associated with drusen of the optic disc. | 20 |
| 10 | 78 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 60 | |
| 18 | Ten year follow-up of photocoagulated central serous choroidopathy. | 14 |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 66 |
About William H. Annesley
William H. Annesley is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (18 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (14 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (865 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (546 citations) and Neurology (158 citations). William H. Annesley has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Jerry A. Shields, Gary C. Brown, Larry A. Donoso, Tamara R. Vrabec, Arcilee Frost, Jay L. Federman, William E. Benson, Larry E. Magargal, L.K. Sarin and George L. Spaeth. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.