Andrew H. Newman

1.0k total citations
28 papers, 655 citations indexed

About

Andrew H. Newman is a scholar working on Safety Research, Management Information Systems and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew H. Newman has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 655 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Safety Research, 11 papers in Management Information Systems and 11 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Andrew H. Newman's work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (23 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (10 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (10 papers). Andrew H. Newman is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (23 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (10 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (10 papers). Andrew H. Newman collaborates with scholars based in United States and Slovenia. Andrew H. Newman's co-authors include R. Lynn Hannan, Ivo Tafkov, Ranjani Krishnan, Donald V. Moser, John H. Evans, Steven J. Kachelmeier, Gary Hecht and Flora H. Zhou and has published in prestigious journals such as The Accounting Review, Accounting Organizations and Society and Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

In The Last Decade

Andrew H. Newman

28 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew H. Newman United States 11 425 184 150 144 137 28 655
Ivo Tafkov United States 12 417 1.0× 171 0.9× 147 1.0× 168 1.2× 138 1.0× 42 672
Gary Hecht United States 12 268 0.6× 236 1.3× 156 1.0× 72 0.5× 102 0.7× 26 582
M. David Piercey United States 15 173 0.4× 602 3.3× 141 0.9× 77 0.5× 171 1.2× 33 844
Khim Kelly United States 14 125 0.3× 221 1.2× 105 0.7× 83 0.6× 51 0.4× 29 472
Kimberly K. Moreno United States 10 132 0.3× 350 1.9× 104 0.7× 70 0.5× 152 1.1× 29 580
Justin Leiby United States 9 117 0.3× 300 1.6× 102 0.7× 58 0.4× 56 0.4× 27 526
Richard Coughlan United States 8 76 0.2× 34 0.2× 25 0.2× 165 1.1× 126 0.9× 15 540
Arjan Non Netherlands 10 206 0.5× 47 0.3× 11 0.1× 91 0.6× 64 0.5× 27 468
Kari Joseph Olsen United States 11 101 0.2× 596 3.2× 24 0.2× 139 1.0× 20 0.1× 30 951
Peter F. Luckett Australia 13 45 0.1× 347 1.9× 192 1.3× 72 0.5× 26 0.2× 18 664

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew H. Newman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew H. Newman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew H. Newman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew H. Newman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew H. Newman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew H. Newman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew H. Newman. The network helps show where Andrew H. Newman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew H. Newman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew H. Newman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew H. Newman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew H. Newman. Andrew H. Newman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Newman, Andrew H., et al.. (2024). When being recognized makes employees feel less appreciated: Evidence regarding when and why peer-to-peer recognition could backfire. Accounting Organizations and Society. 113. 101565–101565. 1 indexed citations
2.
Newman, Andrew H., et al.. (2024). The effect of reward frequency on performance under cash rewards and tangible rewards. Accounting Organizations and Society. 112. 101543–101543. 1 indexed citations
3.
Newman, Andrew H., et al.. (2023). The Effect of Horizontal Pay Transparency on Employee Motivation When Pay Dispersion Is Performance Based and Non-Performance Based. Journal of Management Accounting Research. 36(2). 99–122. 3 indexed citations
4.
Newman, Andrew H., et al.. (2021). Does pay transparency help or hurt? Evidence on employee motivation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
5.
Hannan, R. Lynn, et al.. (2019). The Informativeness of Relative Performance Information and Its Effect on Effort Allocation in a Multitask Environment. Contemporary Accounting Research. 36(3). 1607–1633. 37 indexed citations
6.
Hecht, Gary, Andrew H. Newman, & Ivo Tafkov. (2019). Managers’ strategic use of discretion over relative performance information provision and implications for team-members’ effort. Management Accounting Research. 45. 100638–100638. 16 indexed citations
7.
Newman, Andrew H., Ivo Tafkov, & Flora H. Zhou. (2019). The Effects of Incentive Scheme and Task Difficulty on Employees' Altruistic Behavior Outside the Firm. Contemporary Accounting Research. 37(3). 1512–1535. 12 indexed citations
8.
Newman, Andrew H., et al.. (2018). Performance Feedback Type and Employees' Subsequent Willingness to Help Other Employees. Journal of Management Accounting Research. 31(3). 25–39. 21 indexed citations
9.
Hannan, R. Lynn, et al.. (2017). Designing a Performance Feedback System in a Multi-Task Environment: Relative Performance Information Detail Level and Temporal Aggregation in a Multi-Task Environment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
10.
Newman, Andrew H., et al.. (2016). Organizational Openness, Relative Performance Information (RPI), and Employee Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
11.
Newman, Andrew H., et al.. (2015). A Marathon, a Series of Sprints, or Both? Tournament Horizon and Dynamic Task Complexity in Multi-Period Settings. The Accounting Review. 91(5). 1391–1410. 23 indexed citations
13.
Newman, Andrew H. & Ivo Tafkov. (2014). Relative performance information in tournaments with different prize structures. Accounting Organizations and Society. 39(5). 348–361. 44 indexed citations
14.
Newman, Andrew H.. (2014). An investigation of how the informal communication of firm preferences influences managerial honesty. Accounting Organizations and Society. 39(3). 195–207. 35 indexed citations
15.
Hannan, R. Lynn, et al.. (2012). The Effect of Relative Performance Information on Performance and Effort Allocation in a Multi-Task Environment. The Accounting Review. 88(2). 553–575. 146 indexed citations
16.
Newman, Andrew H. & Ivo Tafkov. (2011). Relative Performance Information in Tournaments with Different Prize Structures. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10 indexed citations
17.
Hannan, R. Lynn, et al.. (2010). The Effect of Relative Performance Information on Effort Allocation and Performance in a Multi-Task Environment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10 indexed citations
18.
Newman, Andrew H.. (2010). The Behavioral Effect of Cost Targets on Managerial Cost Reporting Honesty. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
19.
Hannan, R. Lynn, Ranjani Krishnan, & Andrew H. Newman. (2008). The Effects of Disseminating Relative Performance Feedback in Tournament and Individual Performance Compensation Plans. SSRN Electronic Journal. 16 indexed citations
20.
Newman, Andrew H.. (2001). ADOLESCENT CONSENT TO ROUTINE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL TREATMENT: A PROPOSAL TO SIMPLIFY THE LAW OF TEENAGE MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING. Journal of Legal Medicine. 22(4). 501–532. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026