Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Corporate sustainability and organizational culture
2009690 citationsMartina K. Linnenluecke, Andrew Griffithsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Griffiths
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Griffiths more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Griffiths
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Griffiths. The network helps show where Andrew Griffiths may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Griffiths
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Griffiths.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Griffiths based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Griffiths. Andrew Griffiths is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Andrew Griffiths. (2012). The 2009 Victorian bushfires: A multi-level perspective on organizational risk and resilience. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 20(1-2). 39–44.2 indexed citations
Linnenluecke, Martina K., Andrew Griffiths, & Monika Winn. (2008). ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION AND RESILIENCE TO EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 2008. 1–6.15 indexed citations
13.
Haigh, Nardia & Andrew Griffiths. (2008). A small wins method for addressing climate change and other intractable business issues. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 2008.1 indexed citations
14.
Russell, Sally, Nardia Haigh, & Andrew Griffiths. (2007). Understanding corporate sustainability: recognizing the impact of different governance systems. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 36–56.14 indexed citations
15.
Link, Darren R., et al.. (2005). Enzyme-Inhibitor Assay Using Microdroplets. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.3 indexed citations
Waldersee, Robert, Andrew Griffiths, & Jessica C. Lai. (2003). Predicting Organizational Change Success: Matching Organization Type, Change Type and Capabilities. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 8(1). 66–81.9 indexed citations
18.
Griffiths, Andrew, et al.. (2002). Requirements traceability for embedded software - an industry experience report. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 63–69.8 indexed citations
19.
Griffith, C.D.M., et al.. (2001). Can breast surgeons read mammograms of symptomatic patients in the one-stop breast clinic?. PubMed. 83(2). 108–9.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.