Andrew Aberdein
- Theoretical Computer Science top 5%
- History and Theory of Mathematics 5
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 15
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 5
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 6
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 6
-
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 5
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 3
-
- Free Will and Agency 4
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Andrew Aberdein
32 papers receiving 290 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Theoretical Computer Science 35
- Philosophy 146
- History and Philosophy of Science 45
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
- General Decision Sciences 7
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Aberdein
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Aberdein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Aberdein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Aberdein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Aberdein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Aberdein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Aberdein. The network helps show where Andrew Aberdein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Aberdein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 12 | Arguments with losers | 2016 | 1 |
| 13 | DOES STUDYING LOGIC IMPROVE LOGICAL REASONING | 2016 | 3 |
| 14 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 15 | Commentary on: Michel Dufour's Argument and Explanation in Mathematics | 2013 | 1 |
| 16 | Fallacy and argumentational vice | 2013 | 1 |
| 17 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 18 | Observations on Sick Mathematics | 2010 | 5 |
| 19 | Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques from Informal Logic | 2006 | 7 |
| 20 | Hybrid Pluralism | 2005 | 1 |
About Andrew Aberdein
Andrew Aberdein is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 37 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (5 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (5 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (35 citations), Philosophy (146 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (53 citations) and General Decision Sciences (7 citations). Andrew Aberdein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Inglis, Alison Pease, Ursula Martin, Daniel H. Cohen and Nina Attridge. Their work appears in journals such as Argumentation, Informal Logic, Topoi, ZDM and Philosophia Mathematica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.