This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Pease's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Pease with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Pease more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Pease. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Pease. The network helps show where Alison Pease may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison Pease
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison Pease.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison Pease based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alison Pease. Alison Pease is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cook, Michael, et al.. (2019). Framing In Computational Creativity - A Survey And Taxonomy.. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 156–163.8 indexed citations
6.
Colton, Simon, Alison Pease, Michael Cook, & Chunyang Chen. (2019). The HR3 system for automated code generation in creative settings. Monash University Research Portal (Monash University). 108–115.1 indexed citations
7.
Pease, Alison, Simon Colton, & Rob Saunders. (2018). Issues of Authenticity in Autonomously Creative Systems.. ICCC. 272–279.5 indexed citations
Colton, Simon, et al.. (2014). On acid drops and teardrops: observer issues in computational creativity. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee).9 indexed citations
10.
Pease, Alison, et al.. (2013). A Discussion on Serendipity in Creative Systems. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 64–71.10 indexed citations
11.
Besold, Tarek R., Alison Pease, & Martín Schmidt. (2013). Analogy and Arithmetics: An HDTP-Based Model of the Calculation Circular Staircase. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 1893–1898.2 indexed citations
12.
Cook, Michael, Simon Colton, & Alison Pease. (2012). Aesthetic Considerations for Automated Platformer Design. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment. 8(1). 124–129.26 indexed citations
13.
Guhe, Markus, Alison Pease, Alan Smaill, et al.. (2010). Mathematical reasoning with higher-order anti-unifcation. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32). 1992–1997.7 indexed citations
14.
Guhe, Markus, Alan Smaill, & Alison Pease. (2010). Towards a cognitive model of conceptual blending. Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh). 293–294.1 indexed citations
15.
Guhe, Markus, Alison Pease, & Alan Smaill. (2009). A cognitive model of discovering commutativity. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31). 727–732.4 indexed citations
16.
Gervás, Pablo, et al.. (2005). Notes on Defining Novelty for Computational Creativity. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.1 indexed citations
17.
Colton, Simon & Alison Pease. (2004). Lakatos-style automated theorem modification. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 42(38). 975–976.1 indexed citations
18.
Colton, Simon & Alison Pease. (2003). Lakatos-style methods in automated reasoning. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee).2 indexed citations
Pease, Alison, et al.. (2001). Evaluating Machine Creativity. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee).47 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.