Daniel H. Cohen

454 total citations
37 papers, 259 citations indexed

About

Daniel H. Cohen is a scholar working on Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel H. Cohen has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 259 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Philosophy, 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel H. Cohen's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (4 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). Daniel H. Cohen is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (4 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). Daniel H. Cohen collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Daniel H. Cohen's co-authors include Andrew Aberdein, Edward C. Franklin, Mordechai Pras, Blas Frangione, Jagdip Singh, Detelina Marinova, Hans V. Hansen, John W. Lyga, Jean Goodwin and John Woods and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, The Journal of Educational Research and Journal of Symbolic Logic.

In The Last Decade

Daniel H. Cohen

30 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Daniel H. Cohen
John Biro United States
John C. McDowell United Kingdom
Russell B. Goodman United States
Marshall Swain United States
Michael K. Launer United States
Louis E. Loeb United States
John Biro United States
Daniel H. Cohen
Citations per year, relative to Daniel H. Cohen Daniel H. Cohen (= 1×) peers John Biro

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel H. Cohen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel H. Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel H. Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel H. Cohen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel H. Cohen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel H. Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel H. Cohen. The network helps show where Daniel H. Cohen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel H. Cohen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel H. Cohen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel H. Cohen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel H. Cohen. Daniel H. Cohen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Aberdein, Andrew & Daniel H. Cohen. (2024). Virtue Theories of Argument. Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. 33(2). 117–142.
2.
Cohen, Daniel H., et al.. (2020). Angelic Devil’s Advocates and the Forms of Adversariality. Topoi. 40(5). 899–912. 11 indexed citations
3.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (2019). Keeping an Open Mind and Having a Sense of Proportion as Virtues in Argumentation. 8 indexed citations
4.
Cohen, Daniel H., et al.. (2018). The attraction of the ideal has no traction on the real: on adversariality and roles in argument1. Argumentation and Advocacy. 55(1). 1–23. 13 indexed citations
6.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (2016). The Virtuous Troll: Argumentative Virtues in the Age of (Technologically Enhanced) Argumentative Pluralism. Philosophy & Technology. 30(2). 179–189. 3 indexed citations
7.
Cohen, Daniel H., et al.. (2015). What Virtue Argumentation Theory Misses: The Case of Compathetic Argumentation. Topoi. 35(2). 451–460. 8 indexed citations
8.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (2013). Finocchiaro, Maurice., Meta-argumentation: An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory. ˜The œreview of metaphysics. 67(2). 428. 1 indexed citations
9.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (2012). Hospital Status Admission Determination. Professional Case Management. 17(6). 258–264. 1 indexed citations
10.
Hansen, Hans V. & Daniel H. Cohen. (2011). Are there methods of informal logic. Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor). 1 indexed citations
11.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (2010). Post-9/11 Anti-Terrorism Policy regarding Noncitizens and the Constitutional Idea of Equal Protection under the Laws*. Texas law review. 88(6). 1323. 1 indexed citations
12.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (2009). Sincerity, Santa Claus Arguments and Dissensus in Coalitions. Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor). 2 indexed citations
13.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (2004). Arguments and Metaphors in Philosophy. 17 indexed citations
14.
Cohen, Daniel H., et al.. (2002). Putnam Truth and Informal Logic.. Philosophica. 69(1). 1 indexed citations
15.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (2001). Arguing With God. 1 indexed citations
16.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (1995). TArgument is War...and War is Hell: Philosophy, Education, and Metaphors for Argumentation. Informal Logic. 17(2). 40 indexed citations
18.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (1988). The Word as Will and Idea. Philosophical Studies. 32. 126–140.
19.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (1986). A new axiomatization of Belnap's conditional assertion.. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 27(1). 4 indexed citations
20.
Cohen, Daniel H.. (1985). Putting Paradoxes to Pedagogical Use in Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy. 8(4). 309–317.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026