Lina Bader

794 total citations
40 papers, 491 citations indexed

About

Lina Bader is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Lina Bader has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 491 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 13 papers in General Health Professions and 12 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Lina Bader's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (23 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers). Lina Bader is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (23 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers). Lina Bader collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Lina Bader's co-authors include Ian Bates, Kirsten Galbraith, Naoko Arakawa, Abdoulaye Diop, Simon McGrath, Claire Anderson, Felicity Smith, Michael J. Rouse, Philip J. Schneider and Catherine Duggan and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, Social Indicators Research and BMC Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Lina Bader

38 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lina Bader United Kingdom 14 249 189 155 78 77 40 491
Hoai-An Truong United States 12 146 0.6× 106 0.6× 122 0.8× 44 0.6× 35 0.5× 30 408
Alina Cernasev United States 12 123 0.5× 175 0.9× 189 1.2× 70 0.9× 32 0.4× 66 565
Ankie Hazen Netherlands 12 302 1.2× 91 0.5× 189 1.2× 30 0.4× 106 1.4× 25 497
Lucinda L. Maine United States 16 301 1.2× 323 1.7× 429 2.8× 84 1.1× 71 0.9× 72 909
Lourdes G. Planas United States 15 303 1.2× 92 0.5× 146 0.9× 48 0.6× 78 1.0× 35 554
Chelsea P. Renfro United States 13 210 0.8× 71 0.4× 167 1.1× 41 0.5× 75 1.0× 45 432
Mary F. Powers United States 12 185 0.7× 58 0.3× 103 0.7× 50 0.6× 36 0.5× 37 356
Margaret Keatings Canada 11 76 0.3× 74 0.4× 376 2.4× 59 0.8× 44 0.6× 29 629
Cherie Lucas Australia 17 134 0.5× 287 1.5× 204 1.3× 60 0.8× 26 0.3× 54 689
Lindsey Harrison Australia 11 179 0.7× 55 0.3× 186 1.2× 139 1.8× 89 1.2× 20 520

Countries citing papers authored by Lina Bader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lina Bader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lina Bader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lina Bader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lina Bader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lina Bader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lina Bader. The network helps show where Lina Bader may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lina Bader

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lina Bader. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lina Bader based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lina Bader. Lina Bader is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bader, Lina, et al.. (2024). Developing and validating development goals towards transforming a global framework for pharmacy practice. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 20(12). 1118–1124. 2 indexed citations
2.
Galbraith, Kirsten, et al.. (2023). The development and validation of a global advanced development framework for the pharmacy workforce: a four-stage multi-methods approach. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 45(4). 940–951. 9 indexed citations
3.
4.
5.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2022). A comparative analysis of pharmaceutical workforce development needs across the commonwealth. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 19(1). 167–179. 7 indexed citations
6.
McKeirnan, Kimberly C., et al.. (2021). Advancing a global pharmacy support workforce through a global strategic platform. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 18(8). 3448–3452. 7 indexed citations
7.
Khaled, Salma M., Lina Bader, Peter Woodruff, et al.. (2021). Factors associated with depression and anxiety in the adult population of Qatar after the first COVID-19 wave: a cross-sectional study. Discover Psychology. 1(1). 9–9.
8.
Smith, Felicity, et al.. (2021). Competency-Based Education: Developing an Advanced Competency Framework for Indonesian Pharmacists. Frontiers in Medicine. 8. 769326–769326. 8 indexed citations
9.
Mukhalalati, Banan, et al.. (2021). National assessment of pharmaceutical workforce and education using the International Pharmaceutical Federation’s global development goals: a case study of Qatar. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice. 14(1). 22–22. 2 indexed citations
10.
Arakawa, Naoko & Lina Bader. (2021). Consensus development methods: Considerations for national and global frameworks and policy development. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 18(1). 2222–2229. 41 indexed citations
11.
Bader, Lina, et al.. (2020). Achieving Sustainable Developments Goal 3 on health from global pharmacy workforce. Journal of Global Health. 10(2). 20350–20350. 2 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Felicity, et al.. (2020). Using a global systematic framework tool to guide the advancement of the pharmacy workforce education and training on a national level. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 17(6). 1101–1109. 12 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Felicity, et al.. (2020). Competency development for pharmacy: Adopting and adapting the Global Competency Framework. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 17(4). 771–785. 28 indexed citations
14.
Bader, Lina, Banan Mukhalalati, Ahmed Awaisu, Toyin Tofade, & Ian Bates. (2019). Using a global framework for health workforce development: National case studies on continuing professional development in pharmacy. MedEdPublish. 8. 44–44. 5 indexed citations
15.
Bader, Lina, et al.. (2019). FIP Perspectives: Realising global patient safety goals requires an integrated approach with pharmacy at the core. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 15(7). 815–817. 15 indexed citations
16.
Bader, Lina, et al.. (2019). The FIP Nanjing Statements: Shaping global pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences education. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 15(12). 1472–1475. 13 indexed citations
17.
Bader, Lina & Catherine Duggan. (2019). FIP's Commitment to Action on the WHO Astana Declaration: Transforming pharmacy for better health for all. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 16(5). 724–726. 5 indexed citations
18.
Bader, Lina, et al.. (2018). From workforce intelligence to workforce development: advancing the Eastern Mediterranean pharmaceutical workforce for better health outcomes. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 24(9). 899–904. 11 indexed citations
19.
Bader, Lina, Ian Bates, Philip J. Schneider, & William N. Charman. (2017). Transforming Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Education in the Context of Workforce Development. UCL Discovery (University College London). 24 indexed citations
20.
Bader, Lina, Simon McGrath, Michael J. Rouse, & Claire Anderson. (2016). A conceptual framework toward identifying and analyzing challenges to the advancement of pharmacy. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 13(2). 321–331. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hoai-An Truong Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alina Cernasev Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ankie Hazen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lucinda L. Maine Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lourdes G. Planas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chelsea P. Renfro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary F. Powers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Margaret Keatings Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cherie Lucas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lindsey Harrison
Rankless by CCL
2026