Amy King

436 citations
27 papers · 233 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Amy King

22 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers

Amy King
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Marketing 51
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
  • Development 16
  • Gender Studies 39
  • Political Science and International Relations 84
Replace Kenneth J. Bindas with:
Kenneth J. Bindas United States
Fiona Buckley Ireland
Theresa Reidy Ireland
Clive Scott United Kingdom
Matthew Ming-tak Chew Hong Kong
Troels Bøggild Denmark
Lauren England United Kingdom
Pascal Gielen Belgium
John Charles Smith United Kingdom
Amy King relative to Kenneth J. Bindas United States Kenneth J. Bindas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Kenneth J. Bindas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy King. The network helps show where Amy King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Amy King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy King Line = papers co-authored together Amy King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200981
2 200946
3 201918
4 201611
5 200710
6 201510
7 201010
8 202010
9 20159
10
China–Japan Relations after World War Two: Empire, Industry and War, 1949–1971
20164
11 20243
12
Ballot Order Effects Under Compulsory Voting
20063
13 20153
14 20223
15
Japan in Australia's 2016 Defence White Paper
20162
16 20242
17 20232
18 20241
19
Taiwan's Place in Northeast Asia's Memory Contests: Can Strategic Diplomacy Help?
20161
20 20171

About Amy King

Amy King is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 27 papers that have together received 233 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (4 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers) and China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (51 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations), Development (16 citations), Gender Studies (39 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (84 citations). Amy King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Leigh, Rosemary Foot, M. V. Ramana, Leonard Jack, Michael Wesley, Cynthia White, Hugh White, Kristen A. Copeland, Nicholas Farrelly and William C. Lineaweaver. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science Quarterly, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Journal of Cold War Studies, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations and European Journal of International Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact