Rosemary Foot
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Development top 0.5%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Andrew WalterSaadia PekkanenEvelyn GohAmy KingSebastian HaugBrian RobersonBarry BuzanJudith M. Brown
- Topics
- International Development and Aid (19 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (18 papers)International Relations and Foreign Policy (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rosemary Foot
66 papers receiving 769 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Political Science and International Relations 712
- Sociology and Political Science 487
- Development 345
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 71
- Economics and Econometrics 60
Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary Foot
This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary Foot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary Foot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary Foot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary Foot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary Foot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary Foot. The network helps show where Rosemary Foot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosemary Foot
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosemary Foot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosemary Foot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosemary Foot. Rosemary Foot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power shifts in international organisations: China at the United Nationsbreakdown → | 23 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 74 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | The wrong war | 7 |
| 20 | 9 |
About Rosemary Foot
Rosemary Foot is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 77 papers that have together received 972 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Development and Aid (19 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (18 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (345 citations), Political Science and International Relations (712 citations) and General Energy (15 citations). Rosemary Foot has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Walter, Saadia Pekkanen, Evelyn Goh, Amy King, Sebastian Haug, Brian Roberson, Barry Buzan, Judith M. Brown, Justus D. Doenecke and Kate Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review and Political Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.