Amitabh Chak
- Gastroenterology top 0.1%
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments 29
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment 27
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 0.2%
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes 118
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 46
- Surgery top 0.1%
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment 150
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 128
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 64
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 29
- Co-authors
- Michael SivakGregory S. CooperRichard C.K. WongAnanya DasMarcia Irene CantoJoseph WillisAshley L. FaulxDouglas O. Faigel
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Amitabh Chak
330 papers receiving 10.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Gastroenterology 2.2k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 5.8k
- Surgery 7.5k
- Oncology 4.2k
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 196
Countries citing papers authored by Amitabh Chak
This map shows the geographic impact of Amitabh Chak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amitabh Chak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amitabh Chak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amitabh Chak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amitabh Chak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amitabh Chak. The network helps show where Amitabh Chak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amitabh Chak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 104 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 46 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 5 |
About Amitabh Chak
Amitabh Chak is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 347 papers that have together received 10.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (150 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (128 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (118 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (64 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (46 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (29 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (29 papers) and Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (2.2k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (5.8k citations) and Surgery (7.5k citations). Amitabh Chak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michael Sivak, Gregory S. Cooper, Richard C.K. Wong, Ananya Das, Marcia Irene Canto, Joseph Willis, Ashley L. Faulx, Douglas O. Faigel, Jeffrey M. Marks and Brenda J. Hoffman. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Blood and Annals of Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.