Amina Omrane

42 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Amina Omrane
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 73
  • Business and International Management 19
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 57
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Strategy and Management 60
Replace Michael M. Pearson with:
Michael M. Pearson United States
Mandeep Singh India
Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy Japan
Ugo Merlone Italy
Jorge de Andrés Sánchez Spain
Călin-Adrian Comes Romania
Hsiu‐Li Chen Taiwan
Jay Chok United States
David Coates United Kingdom
James Alexander Türkiye
Amina Omrane relative to Michael M. Pearson United States Michael M. Pearson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Michael M. Pearson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amina Omrane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amina Omrane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amina Omrane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amina Omrane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amina Omrane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amina Omrane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amina Omrane. The network helps show where Amina Omrane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Amina Omrane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amina Omrane Line = papers co-authored together Amina Omrane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202039
2 201829
3 202123
4 201122
5 202219
6 200318
7 202117
8 201515
9 201114
10 199914
11 202113
12 200213
13 200411
14 20088
15 20137
16 20226
17 20195
18 20215
19 20234
20 20154

About Amina Omrane

Amina Omrane is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (11 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (10 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (6 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (6 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (4 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (4 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (3 papers) and Environmental Sustainability in Business (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (73 citations), Business and International Management (19 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (57 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations) and Strategy and Management (60 citations). Amina Omrane has collaborated with scholars based in Tunisia, France and India. Frequent co-authors include Claire Seaman, Alain Fayolle, Shubham Joshi, Anne Nouri, Prathamesh Churi, J. P. Vila, Mohamed Elhoseny, Hasan Oudah Abdullah, Alhamzah Alnoor and Khai Wah Khaw. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of African Business, Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications and International Journal of Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact