Amber Johnson

25 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

Amber Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Archeology 6
  • Gender Studies 50
  • Communication 31
  • Paleontology 21
  • Anthropology 23
Replace William K. Powers with:
William K. Powers Netherlands
William M. Clements United States
Philip M. Peek United States
Joseph E. Holloway United States
W. F. H. Nicolaisen United States
J. Hillis Miller
Barre Toelken United States
Andrew J. Weaver United States
Eva Reimers Sweden
David A. Leeming United States
Amber Johnson relative to William K. Powers Netherlands William K. Powers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.7×
William K. Powers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Johnson. The network helps show where Amber Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Amber Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Amber Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202157
2
Processual Archaeology: Exploring Analytical Strategies, Frames of Reference, and Culture Process
200429
3 201423
4 201819
5 201418
6 201415
7 201413
8
Memorable familial messages about sex: A qualitative content analysis of college student narratives
20137
9 20205
10 20245
11 20213
12 20213
13 20213
14 20173
15 20183
16
Communication and Bonding Between African-American Middle School Girls and Their Maternal Figures.
20162
17 20172
18 20182
19 20192
20 20172

About Amber Johnson

Amber Johnson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies, Philosophy, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 222 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (6 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (4 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers) and Service-Learning and Community Engagement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (6 citations), Gender Studies (50 citations), Communication (31 citations), Paleontology (21 citations) and Anthropology (23 citations). Amber Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Mark P. Orbe, Angela Cooke‐Jackson, Cynthia S. Wang, Tanya Menon, Jennifer Whitson, Lorelle J. Burton, Ian M. MacFarlane, Robin Bartlett, Tait Sanders and Amy B. Mullens. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Inquiry, Howard Journal of Communications, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, Journal of Applied Psychology and Health Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact