Philip M. Peek

97 total papers · 635 total citations
37 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

Philip M. Peek is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Urban Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip M. Peek has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Anthropology, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Urban Studies. Recurrent topics in Philip M. Peek's work include African history and culture studies (13 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (6 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers). Philip M. Peek is often cited by papers focused on African history and culture studies (13 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (6 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers). Philip M. Peek collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ethiopia. Philip M. Peek's co-authors include Wyatt MacGaffey, Michael Jackson, Kwesi Yankah, Stephen D. Glazier, Martha G. Anderson, W.E.A. van Beek, Peter A. G. M. De Smet, George Eaton Simpson, P. Stanley Yoder and Andrew P. Lyons and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Current Anthropology and American Ethnologist.

In The Last Decade

Philip M. Peek

29 papers receiving 191 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Philip M. Peek	101	94	41	32	28	37	310
Robert Plant Armstrong	78 0.8×	82 0.9×	17 0.4×	23 0.7×	31 1.1×	26	345
Charlotte J. Frisbie	91 0.9×	64 0.7×	19 0.5×	40 1.3×	17 0.6×	40	366
Clara Sue Kidwell	76 0.8×	108 1.1×	41 1.0×	8 0.3×	23 0.8×	40	323
Jean‐Paul Dumont	102 1.0×	121 1.3×	15 0.4×	12 0.4×	18 0.6×	31	305
Edward Geoffrey Parrinder	64 0.6×	119 1.3×	60 1.5×	10 0.3×	49 1.8×	38	280
Claire R. Farrer	60 0.6×	101 1.1×	17 0.4×	10 0.3×	18 0.6×	27	306
Philip E. Leis	73 0.7×	157 1.7×	34 0.8×	11 0.3×	22 0.8×	22	359
Paul Henley	75 0.7×	95 1.0×	9 0.2×	20 0.6×	21 0.8×	46	272
Louis Molet	75 0.7×	137 1.5×	19 0.5×	11 0.3×	44 1.6×	29	337
William K. Powers	56 0.6×	69 0.7×	20 0.5×	10 0.3×	17 0.6×	39	276

Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Peek

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Peek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Peek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Peek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Peek

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Peek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Peek. The network helps show where Philip M. Peek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Peek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Peek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Peek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Peek. Philip M. Peek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact