Amara Malik

510 citations
40 papers · 330 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Amara Malik

36 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

Amara Malik
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Library and Information Sciences 91
  • Communication 75
  • Information Systems and Management 44
  • Information Systems 112
  • Sociology and Political Science 108
Replace Christina Courtright with:
Christina Courtright United States
Lorri Mon United States
Muhammad Asim Qayyum Australia
Pat Gannon‐Leary United Kingdom
Shifra Baruchson‐Arbib Israel
Carol Landry United States
Midrar Ullah Pakistan
Emmanuel E. Baro Nigeria
Valérie Spezi United Kingdom
Alison Yeoman United Kingdom
Amara Malik relative to Christina Courtright United States Christina Courtright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×22.8×
Christina Courtright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amara Malik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amara Malik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amara Malik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amara Malik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amara Malik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amara Malik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amara Malik. The network helps show where Amara Malik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Amara Malik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amara Malik Line = papers co-authored together Amara Malik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202148
2 202134
3
Web search behavior of university students: a case study at University of the Punjab
200922
4 202220
5 202118
6 202317
7 201314
8 201314
9 202014
10 201813
11 202212
12 202211
13 20179
14 20208
15 20227
16 20217
17 20207
18 20106
19 20225
20 20195

About Amara Malik

Amara Malik is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 40 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (14 papers), Library Science and Administration (8 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (8 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Web and Library Services (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (91 citations), Communication (75 citations), Information Systems and Management (44 citations), Information Systems (112 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (108 citations). Amara Malik has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, Switzerland and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Khalid Mahmood, Kanwal Ameen, Talat Islam, Iqra Bashir, Nosheen Fatima Warraich, Arslan Sheikh, Muhammad Asif Naveed, Syeda Hina Batool, Haseena Khan and Muhammad Rafiq. Their work appears in journals such as Information Development, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Library Review, Library Hi Tech and The Journal of Academic Librarianship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact