Amanda Williams
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Information Systems top 10%
- Education
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Co-authors
- Larry KatzKen AndersonJohanna BrewerPaul DourishDaniela K. RosnerEric PaulosLeah BuechleyScott Counts
- Topics
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers)Interactive and Immersive Displays (9 papers)Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Amanda Williams
19 papers receiving 435 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Human-Computer Interaction 238
- Sociology and Political Science 105
- Information Systems 103
- Education 55
- Computer Science Applications 51
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Williams. The network helps show where Amanda Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Williams. Amanda Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 35 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 62 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | Outstanding Library Service to Children: Putting the Core Competencies to Work | 3 |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 88 | |
| 20 | The Use of Focus Group Methodology in Education: Some Theoretical and Practical Considerations, 5(3) | 67 |
About Amanda Williams
Amanda Williams is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Library and Information Sciences and Computer Science Applications, having authored 22 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (9 papers) and Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (238 citations), Computer Science Applications (51 citations) and Museology (16 citations). Amanda Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Larry Katz, Ken Anderson, Johanna Brewer, Paul Dourish, Daniela K. Rosner, Eric Paulos, Leah Buechley, Paul Dourish, Scott Counts and Shelly Farnham. Their work appears in journals such as Human-Computer Interaction, IEEE Pervasive Computing and interactions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.