Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.
20021.1k citationsAnthony G. Greenwald, Mahzarin R. Banaji et al.Psychological Reviewprofile →
Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.
2000878 citationsAnthony G. Greenwald, Shelly FarnhamJournal of Personality and Social Psychologyprofile →
Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.
2000854 citationsAnthony G. Greenwald, Shelly FarnhamJournal of Personality and Social Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Shelly Farnham
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Shelly Farnham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shelly Farnham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shelly Farnham more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shelly Farnham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shelly Farnham. The network helps show where Shelly Farnham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shelly Farnham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shelly Farnham.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shelly Farnham based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Shelly Farnham. Shelly Farnham is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Farnham, Shelly, et al.. (2012). Puget Sound Off: Fostering Youth Civic Engagement through Citizen Journalism in a Local Community Context. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).1 indexed citations
Riegelsberger, Jens, et al.. (2006). Sounds good to me. 159–162.9 indexed citations
10.
Farnham, Shelly, Elin Rønby Pedersen, & Robert Kirkpatrick. (2006). Observation of Katrina/Rita Groove Deployment: Addressing Social and Communication Challenges of Ephemeral Groups.15 indexed citations
Greenwald, Anthony G., Mahzarin R. Banaji, Laurie A. Rudman, et al.. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.. Psychological Review. 109(1). 3–25.1121 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Greenwald, Anthony G., Jacqueline E. Pickrell, & Shelly Farnham. (2002). Implicit partisanship: Taking sides for no reason.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83(2). 367–379.7 indexed citations
Farnham, Shelly, et al.. (2001). Designing for Sociability in Shared Browsers.. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 115–123.12 indexed citations
18.
Greenwald, Anthony G. & Shelly Farnham. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 79(6). 1022–1038.878 indexed citations breakdown →
Block, Robert I., et al.. (1990). Long-term marijuana use and subsequent effects on learning and cognitive functions related to school achievement: preliminary study.. PubMed. 101. 96–111.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.