Nick Merrill

1.0k citations
33 papers · 645 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Merrill

32 papers receiving 638 citations

Peers

Nick Merrill
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Human-Computer Interaction 351
  • Safety Research 87
  • Computer Science Applications 50
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Applied Psychology 29
Replace Joseph Lindley with:
Joseph Lindley United Kingdom
Elisa Rubegni United Kingdom
Nazlı Cila Netherlands
Martin Porcheron United Kingdom
Sandy J. J. Gould United Kingdom
Peter Gall Krogh Denmark
James Auger United Kingdom
Pat Pataranutaporn United States
Wolmet Barendregt Sweden
Tamara Clegg United States
Nick Merrill relative to Joseph Lindley United Kingdom Joseph Lindley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Joseph Lindley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Merrill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Merrill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Merrill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Merrill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Merrill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Merrill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Merrill. The network helps show where Nick Merrill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Merrill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Merrill Line = papers co-authored together Nick Merrill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020117
2 2018116
3 202370
4 202061
5 201727
6 201823
7 202021
8 201820
9 201619
10 201819
11 202014
12 201914
13 201314
14 202014
15 202313
16 201613
17 201912
18 201610
19 20147
20 20177

About Nick Merrill

Nick Merrill is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Safety Research, having authored 33 papers that have together received 645 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (15 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (5 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Persona Design and Applications (3 papers) and Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (351 citations), Safety Research (87 citations), Computer Science Applications (50 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations) and Applied Psychology (29 citations). Nick Merrill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richmond Y. Wong, Katherine Isbister, Joshua McVeigh-Schultz, Elena Márquez Segura, John Chuang, Coye Cheshire, Michael Madaio, Sarah Fox, Chris Elsden and Noura Howell. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Frontiers in Environmental Science and First Monday.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact