Amanda Potts
Impact in
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
- Media Studies and Communication
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Papers in
-
- Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity 2
- Translation Studies and Practices 2
-
- Digital Games and Media 2
- Co-authors
- Paul Baker (2 shared papers)Elena Semino (2 shared papers)Monika Bednarek (2 shared papers)Helen Caple (1 shared paper)Johann Wolfgang Unger (1 shared paper)Will Simm (1 shared paper)Jon Whittle (1 shared paper)Andrew Hardie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Critical Discourse Studies (2 papers)University of Pittsburgh Law Review (1 paper)Corpora (1 paper)Discourse & Society (1 paper)Metaphor and Symbol (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Amanda Potts
13 papers receiving 243 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Communication 70
- Literature and Literary Theory 50
- Gender Studies 41
- Linguistics and Language 17
- Language and Linguistics 32
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Potts
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Potts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Potts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Potts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Potts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Potts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Potts. The network helps show where Amanda Potts may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Potts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | AraSAS : a semantic tagger for Arabic | 2013 | 1 |
| 13 | London 2012 media impact study : Report for the Department for Culture Media and Sport | 2013 | 1 |
| 14 | London 2012 Games Media Impact Study | 2013 | 0 |
About Amanda Potts
Amanda Potts is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Communication and General Health Professions, having authored 14 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (2 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (70 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (50 citations), Gender Studies (41 citations), Linguistics and Language (17 citations) and Language and Linguistics (32 citations). Amanda Potts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Paul Baker, Elena Semino, Monika Bednarek, Helen Caple, Johann Wolfgang Unger, Will Simm, Jon Whittle, Andrew Hardie, Richard Xiao and Tony McEnery. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Discourse Studies, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Corpora, Discourse & Society and Metaphor and Symbol.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.