Countries where authors publish in University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in University of Pittsburgh Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in University of Pittsburgh Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Pittsburgh Law Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in University of Pittsburgh Law Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in University of Pittsburgh Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in University of Pittsburgh Law Review.
About University of Pittsburgh Law Review
The 355 papers published in University of Pittsburgh Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 814 indexed citations . Papers published in University of Pittsburgh Law Review usually cover Law (91 papers), Political Science and International Relations (137 papers) and Accounting (33 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (84 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (38 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (30 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (28 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (28 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (23 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (18 papers) and Business Law and Ethics (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in University of Pittsburgh Law Review are Pamela Samuelson, Kevin Outterson, Matthew J. Mitten, Robert M. Lawless, Mark Fenster, Michael B. Sinclair, Jesse H. Choper, Thaddeus Mason Pope, David Martin and Elizabeth M. Schneider.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.