Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press
2008921 citationsPaul Baker, Costas Gabrielatos et al.profile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Baker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Baker. The network helps show where Paul Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Baker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Baker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Baker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Baker. Paul Baker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Baker, Paul & Tony McEnery. (2015). Corpora and discourse studies : integrating discourse and corpora. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).17 indexed citations
11.
Baker, Paul & Tony McEnery. (2014). 'Find the doctors of death' : press representation of foreign doctors working in the NHS, a corpus based approach. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).4 indexed citations
Baker, Paul. (2009). Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. Continuum eBooks.142 indexed citations
14.
Baker, Paul, Andrew Hardie, & Tony McEnery. (2006). A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press eBooks.102 indexed citations
15.
Gabrielatos, Costas & Paul Baker. (2006). Representation of refugees and asylum seekers in UK newspapers: Towards a corpus-based analysis.. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 94(1). 54–61.4 indexed citations
16.
Baker, Paul, Andrew Hardie, Tony McEnery, Hamish Cunningham, & Robert Gaizauskas. (2002). EMILLE, A 67-million word corpus of indic languages:Data collection, mark-up and harmonisation. Language Resources and Evaluation.39 indexed citations
17.
Tablan, Valentin, Cristian Ursu, Kalina Bontcheva, et al.. (2002). A unicode-based environment for creation and use of language resources.. Language Resources and Evaluation.13 indexed citations
18.
McEnery, Tony, Paul Baker, & Lou Burnard. (2000). Corpus Resources and Minority Language Engineering. Language Resources and Evaluation.7 indexed citations
19.
Burnard, Lou, Tony McEnery, Paul Baker, & Andrew Wilson. (1998). Validation tecniques for language corpora: a report from the front.. Language Resources and Evaluation. 135–142.2 indexed citations
20.
Baker, Paul, et al.. (1984). Linguistic Insecurity in Winnipeg: Validation of a Canadian Index of Insecurity.. Language in Society. 13(3).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.