Ann Taves
Impact in
- Health top 2%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Philosophy top 1%
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Study and Philosophy of Religion
Papers in
- Health 18
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 18
- Philosophy 19
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 11
- Study and Philosophy of Religion 11
- Co-authors
- Egil AspremAmanda PorterfieldElliott IhmColleen McDannellHelen Rose EbaughMichael BarlevRobert A. OrsiRaymond F. Paloutzian
- Journals
- Religion (7 papers)Religion Brain & Behavior (5 papers)Journal of the American Academy of Religion (4 papers)Church History (2 papers)Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwaySweden
In The Last Decade
Ann Taves
60 papers receiving 754 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Health 274
- Philosophy 236
- General Psychology 20
- Religious studies 79
- Sociology and Political Science 460
Countries citing papers authored by Ann Taves
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Taves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Taves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Taves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Taves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Taves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Taves. The network helps show where Ann Taves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ann Taves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 63 | |
| 6 | Comparing Nonordinary Experiences: Surveying, Validating, and Mapping Similarities and Differences in the US and India | 2019 | 1 |
| 7 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 12 | What are our academic assumptions about religion | 2011 | 2 |
| 13 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 244 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 21 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 3 |
About Ann Taves
Ann Taves is a scholar working on Health, Philosophy, General Psychology, Religious studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 69 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (20 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (18 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (12 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (11 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (11 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (8 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (7 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (274 citations), Philosophy (236 citations), General Psychology (20 citations), Religious studies (79 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (460 citations). Ann Taves has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Egil Asprem, Amanda Porterfield, Elliott Ihm, Colleen McDannell, Helen Rose Ebaugh, Michael Barlev, Robert A. Orsi, Raymond F. Paloutzian, Wesley J. Wildman and David Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as Religion, Religion Brain & Behavior, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Church History and Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.