Amanda L. Griffith

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
22 papers, 847 citations indexed

About

Amanda L. Griffith is a scholar working on Education, Safety Research and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda L. Griffith has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 847 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Education, 5 papers in Safety Research and 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Amanda L. Griffith's work include Higher Education Research Studies (12 papers), School Choice and Performance (8 papers) and Innovations in Educational Methods (7 papers). Amanda L. Griffith is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Research Studies (12 papers), School Choice and Performance (8 papers) and Innovations in Educational Methods (7 papers). Amanda L. Griffith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Uzbekistan and China. Amanda L. Griffith's co-authors include Kevin N. Rask, Donna S. Rothstein, Joyce Main, Frederick Chen, Allin Cottrell, Yue‐Ling Wong, Heather L. Baker, Kenneth D. Belanger and Andrew C. Strine and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Southern Economic Journal and Economics of Education Review.

In The Last Decade

Amanda L. Griffith

21 papers receiving 775 citations

Hit Papers

Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors:... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda L. Griffith United States 10 480 283 115 109 99 22 847
Tatiana Melguizo United States 22 975 2.0× 209 0.7× 169 1.5× 147 1.3× 50 0.5× 45 1.2k
Jeff Strohl United States 10 557 1.2× 122 0.4× 154 1.3× 116 1.1× 29 0.3× 30 825
Katherine L. Hughes United States 20 960 2.0× 186 0.7× 148 1.3× 121 1.1× 23 0.2× 81 1.2k
Alexander C. McCormick United States 19 959 2.0× 152 0.5× 104 0.9× 47 0.4× 46 0.5× 43 1.3k
Dongbin Kim United States 17 821 1.7× 171 0.6× 304 2.6× 92 0.8× 46 0.5× 40 1.3k
John C. Hayek United States 9 882 1.8× 94 0.3× 183 1.6× 43 0.4× 58 0.6× 13 1.2k
Kimberlee A. Shauman United States 13 292 0.6× 183 0.6× 368 3.2× 198 1.8× 83 0.8× 15 1.2k
David Langdon United States 6 261 0.5× 271 1.0× 108 0.9× 53 0.5× 141 1.4× 8 683
Victor M. H. Borden United States 15 428 0.9× 77 0.3× 191 1.7× 54 0.5× 39 0.4× 66 1.0k
Regina Deil‐Amen United States 19 1.2k 2.5× 161 0.6× 507 4.4× 85 0.8× 34 0.3× 45 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda L. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda L. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda L. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda L. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda L. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda L. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda L. Griffith. The network helps show where Amanda L. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda L. Griffith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda L. Griffith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda L. Griffith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda L. Griffith. Amanda L. Griffith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Main, Joyce & Amanda L. Griffith. (2024). The Impact of Math and Science Remedial Education on Engineering Major Choice, Degree Attainment, and Time to Degree. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 1 indexed citations
2.
Main, Joyce, et al.. (2021). Choosing an engineering major: A conceptual model of student pathways into engineering. Journal of Engineering Education. 111(1). 40–64. 12 indexed citations
3.
Griffith, Amanda L. & Joyce Main. (2021). The role of the teaching assistant: Female role models in the classroom. Economics of Education Review. 85. 102179–102179. 8 indexed citations
4.
Griffith, Amanda L., et al.. (2021). Under pressure: How faculty gender and contract uncertainty impact students’ grades. Economics of Education Review. 83. 102126–102126. 9 indexed citations
5.
Griffith, Amanda L. & Joyce Main. (2019). First impressions in the classroom: How do class characteristics affect student grades and majors?. Economics of Education Review. 69. 125–137. 17 indexed citations
6.
Main, Joyce & Amanda L. Griffith. (2019). From SIGNALS to success? The effects of an online advising system on course grades. Education Economics. 27(6). 608–623. 6 indexed citations
8.
Griffith, Amanda L. & Kevin N. Rask. (2016). THE EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL EXPENDITURES ON EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES AND EARNINGS. Economic Inquiry. 54(4). 1931–1945. 11 indexed citations
9.
Griffith, Amanda L. & Kevin N. Rask. (2014). Peer effects in higher education: A look at heterogeneous impacts. Economics of Education Review. 39. 65–77. 33 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Frederick, Amanda L. Griffith, Allin Cottrell, & Yue‐Ling Wong. (2013). Behavioral Responses to Epidemics in an Online Experiment: Using Virtual Diseases to Study Human Behavior. PLoS ONE. 8(1). e52814–e52814. 26 indexed citations
11.
Griffith, Amanda L., et al.. (2013). Using PGA Tour Results to Illustrate the Effects of Selection Bias. The Journal of Economic Education. 44(3). 238–248. 2 indexed citations
13.
Griffith, Amanda L.. (2011). Keeping up with the Joneses: Institutional changes following the adoption of a merit aid policy. Economics of Education Review. 30(5). 1022–1033. 2 indexed citations
14.
Griffith, Amanda L.. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?. Economics of Education Review. 29(6). 911–922. 428 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Griffith, Amanda L. & Donna S. Rothstein. (2009). Can’t get there from here: The decision to apply to a selective college. Economics of Education Review. 28(5). 620–628. 75 indexed citations
16.
Griffith, Amanda L.. (2008). Determinants of Grades, Persistence and Major Choice for Low-Income and Minority Students. eCommons (Cornell University). 4 indexed citations
17.
Griffith, Amanda L. & Donna S. Rothstein. (2007). Can't Get Here from There: The Decision to Apply to a Selective Institution.. eCommons (Cornell University). 3 indexed citations
18.
Griffith, Amanda L. & Kevin N. Rask. (2006). The influence of the US News and World Report collegiate rankings on the matriculation decision of high-ability students: 1995–2004. Economics of Education Review. 26(2). 244–255. 122 indexed citations
19.
Griffith, Amanda L. & Kevin N. Rask. (2004). The Influence of the U.S. News and World Report Collegiate Rankings on the Matriculation Decision of High-Ability Students: 1995-2003. SSRN Electronic Journal. 49 indexed citations
20.
Griffith, Amanda L.. (1955). The Possibilities of Tree-Breeding and of Tree Seed Orchards in East Africa. The East African Agricultural Journal. 20(4). 241–244.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026