Amanda J. Rose
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 0.2%
- Education top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Co-authors
- Karen D. RudolphErika M. WallerSteven R. AsherAntonius H. N. CillessenRebecca A. Schwartz‐MetteLance P. SwensonWendy CarlsonRhiannon L. Smith
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (38 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (25 papers)Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenCanada
In The Last Decade
Amanda J. Rose
53 papers receiving 5.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Clinical Psychology 4.0k
- Social Psychology 3.6k
- Education 1.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.3k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda J. Rose
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda J. Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda J. Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda J. Rose more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda J. Rose
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda J. Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda J. Rose. The network helps show where Amanda J. Rose may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda J. Rose
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda J. Rose. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda J. Rose based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda J. Rose. Amanda J. Rose is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 54 | |
| 6 | 162 | |
| 7 | 43 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 56 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 115 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 385 | |
| 18 | A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys.breakdown → | 1821 |
| 19 | 71 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Amanda J. Rose
Amanda J. Rose is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 6.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (38 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (25 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (4.0k citations), Social Psychology (3.6k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k citations). Amanda J. Rose has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Karen D. Rudolph, Erika M. Waller, Steven R. Asher, Antonius H. N. Cillessen, Rebecca A. Schwartz‐Mette, Lance P. Swenson, Wendy Carlson, Rhiannon L. Smith, Gary C. Glick and Sarah K. Borowski. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Child Development and Developmental Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.