Amanda Clinton

603 total citations
25 papers, 235 citations indexed

About

Amanda Clinton is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Clinton has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 235 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Social Psychology, 10 papers in Clinical Psychology and 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amanda Clinton's work include Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). Amanda Clinton is often cited by papers focused on Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). Amanda Clinton collaborates with scholars based in Puerto Rico, United States and Poland. Amanda Clinton's co-authors include David Shriberg, Magdalena Żemojtel‐Piotrowska, Jarosław Piotrowski, Margaret Semrud‐Clikeman, Kathleen Nielsen, Robert T. Connor, Leihua Van Schoiack Edstrom, John C. Begeny, Kate E. Norwalk and Manuel Soriano Ferrer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Learning Disabilities and Journal of School Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Clinton

20 papers receiving 213 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda Clinton Puerto Rico 9 92 78 74 53 53 25 235
Оlga V. Almazova Russia 9 69 0.8× 35 0.4× 135 1.8× 19 0.4× 113 2.1× 73 265
Jared M. Bartels United States 10 51 0.6× 82 1.1× 57 0.8× 41 0.8× 41 0.8× 31 265
Deirdre V. Lovecky United States 7 72 0.8× 77 1.0× 66 0.9× 32 0.6× 117 2.2× 10 311
Pierrette Verlaan Canada 10 183 2.0× 71 0.9× 44 0.6× 35 0.7× 73 1.4× 38 259
Florian Kießling Germany 9 65 0.7× 110 1.4× 126 1.7× 8 0.2× 53 1.0× 10 263
С.Н. Ениколопов Russia 10 144 1.6× 107 1.4× 80 1.1× 40 0.8× 27 0.5× 86 323
Kari A. Sassu United States 6 147 1.6× 88 1.1× 178 2.4× 46 0.9× 83 1.6× 13 279
Gülen Baran Türkiye 10 80 0.9× 28 0.4× 49 0.7× 34 0.6× 128 2.4× 42 278
Julie Webb United States 7 72 0.8× 32 0.4× 56 0.8× 16 0.3× 116 2.2× 10 260
Joana Baptista Portugal 11 209 2.3× 54 0.7× 41 0.6× 17 0.3× 67 1.3× 46 314

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Clinton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Clinton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Clinton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Clinton. The network helps show where Amanda Clinton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Clinton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Clinton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Clinton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Clinton. Amanda Clinton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bullock, Merry, Michael J. Stevens, Danny Wedding, & Amanda Clinton. (2024). The Handbook of International Psychology. Lund University Publications (Lund University).
2.
Clinton, Amanda, et al.. (2022). Development and Validation of SERR Scale for Detecting Extremism and Religious Radicalism. Psicothema. 4(34). 593–602.
3.
Kim, Hee Sun, Amanda Clinton, CATHERINE L. GRUS, et al.. (2022). Regulations governing psychologists: An international survey.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 53(6). 541–552.
4.
Clinton, Amanda. (2020). Psychological and Educational Consultation in the International Context. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. 30(4). 412–419. 1 indexed citations
5.
Żemojtel‐Piotrowska, Magdalena, et al.. (2019). Narcissism and its relationship with counterproductive work behavior: Mediational effects of psychological entitlement and subjective well-being. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 442–448. 4 indexed citations
7.
Piotrowski, Jarosław, Magdalena Żemojtel‐Piotrowska, & Amanda Clinton. (2018). Spiritual transcendence as a buffer against death anxiety. Current Psychology. 39(3). 994–1000. 10 indexed citations
8.
Żemojtel‐Piotrowska, Magdalena, et al.. (2015). Entitlement and organizational behaviors: the moderating role of narcissism. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(4). 230–241. 7 indexed citations
9.
Żemojtel‐Piotrowska, Magdalena, Jarosław Piotrowski, & Amanda Clinton. (2015). Agency, communion and entitlement. International Journal of Psychology. 51(3). 196–204. 8 indexed citations
10.
Żemojtel‐Piotrowska, Magdalena, Jarosław Piotrowski, Amanda Clinton, et al.. (2015). Entitlement and subjective well-being: a three-nations study. Health Psychology Report. 3(2). 140–149. 12 indexed citations
11.
Żemojtel‐Piotrowska, Magdalena, Amanda Clinton, & Jarosław Piotrowski. (2014). Agentic and communal narcissism and subjective well-being: are narcissistic individuals unhappy? A research report. Current Issues in Personality Psychology. 2(1). 10–16. 11 indexed citations
12.
Clinton, Amanda, Laura M. Crothers, Jered B. Kolbert, et al.. (2014). A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Relational and Social Aggression in Female College Students from Puerto Rico and the United States. Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma. 23(2). 99–115. 2 indexed citations
13.
Clinton, Amanda, et al.. (2014). Social emotional learning in a Guatemalan preschool sample: Does socioeconomic status moderate the effects of a school-based prevention program?. School Psychology International. 36(1). 18–35. 12 indexed citations
14.
Żemojtel‐Piotrowska, Magdalena, Tomasz Baran, Amanda Clinton, et al.. (2013). Materialism, subjective well-being, and entitlement. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 12 indexed citations
15.
Clinton, Amanda, et al.. (2013). Learning to Read in Spanish: Contributions of Phonological Awareness, Orthographic Coding, and Rapid Naming. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology. 1(1). 36–46. 2 indexed citations
16.
Clinton, Amanda, et al.. (2011). Strategies for the Introduction of Neuroscience for Underrepresented University Students.. The journal of college science teaching. 40(5). 38–45. 1 indexed citations
17.
Clinton, Amanda, et al.. (2010). Community participation in the cultural adaptation of a prevention curriculum. School Psychology International. 31(5). 467–477. 8 indexed citations
18.
Dombrowski, Stefan C., Don Ambrose, & Amanda Clinton. (2007). Dogmatic Insularity in Learning Disabilities Classification and the Critical Need for a Philosophical Analysis.. International Journal of Special Education (IJSE). 22(1). 3–10. 6 indexed citations
19.
Clinton, Amanda, et al.. (1999). Golpe de estadio. Chasqui. 28(1). 140–140. 1 indexed citations
20.
Clinton, Amanda, et al.. (1998). La vendedora de rosas. Chasqui. 27(2). 185–185. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026