Amal Rassam
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- History top 5%
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Dale F. EickelmanDaniel G. BatesJulia Clancy‐SmithDavid LevinsonJohn MiddletonCandice BradleyMarshall Joseph BeckerRobert T. Francoeur
- Topics
- Islamic Studies and History (7 papers)Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers)Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Amal Rassam
12 papers receiving 184 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Sociology and Political Science 157
- Political Science and International Relations 121
- Anthropology 74
- History 32
- Gender Studies 24
Countries citing papers authored by Amal Rassam
This map shows the geographic impact of Amal Rassam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amal Rassam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amal Rassam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amal Rassam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amal Rassam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amal Rassam. The network helps show where Amal Rassam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amal Rassam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amal Rassam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amal Rassam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amal Rassam. Amal Rassam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | International Law and Contemporary Forms of Slavery: An Economic and Social Rights-Based Approach | 12 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | Africa and the Middle East | 8 |
| 5 | Land tenure in the Ivory Coast : a developing problem and a problem for development | 2 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Peoples and Cultures of the Middle East | 37 |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 141 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 0 |
About Amal Rassam
Amal Rassam is a scholar working on Anthropology, Religious studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 16 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (7 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers) and Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (74 citations), Political Science and International Relations (121 citations) and Religious studies (22 citations). Amal Rassam has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dale F. Eickelman, Daniel G. Bates, Julia Clancy‐Smith, David Levinson, John Middleton, Candice Bradley, Marshall Joseph Becker, Robert T. Francoeur, Vern L. Bullough and Dona Lee Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Political Science Quarterly, The Journal of Sex Research and American Ethnologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.