Curtis A. Keim
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Education
- Co-authors
- Ronald TakakiGail M. GerhartEnid SchildkroutRalph A. AustenFrederick QuinnChristopher J. ColvinDennis D. CordellChristraud M. Geary
- Topics
- African history and culture studies (8 papers)Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (4 papers)African history and culture analysis (3 papers)
- Journals
- Foreign AffairsThe American Historical ReviewThe International Journal of African Historical Studies
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Curtis A. Keim
21 papers receiving 181 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Sociology and Political Science 143
- Anthropology 86
- Political Science and International Relations 37
- Cultural Studies 31
- Education 29
Countries citing papers authored by Curtis A. Keim
This map shows the geographic impact of Curtis A. Keim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Curtis A. Keim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Curtis A. Keim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Curtis A. Keim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Curtis A. Keim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Curtis A. Keim. The network helps show where Curtis A. Keim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Curtis A. Keim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Curtis A. Keim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Curtis A. Keim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Curtis A. Keim. Curtis A. Keim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 91 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | Precolonial Mangbetu rule : political and economic factors in nineteenth-century Mangbetu history (Northeast Zaire) | 4 |
About Curtis A. Keim
Curtis A. Keim is a scholar working on Anthropology, Space and Planetary Science and Conservation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (8 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (4 papers) and African history and culture analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (86 citations), Archeology (5 citations) and Cultural Studies (31 citations). Curtis A. Keim has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Takaki, Gail M. Gerhart, Enid Schildkrout, Ralph A. Austen, Frederick Quinn, Christopher J. Colvin, Dennis D. Cordell, Christraud M. Geary, Jan Vansina and Monni Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review and The International Journal of African Historical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.